Explore Workflows

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.2.git

Path: tests/dynresreq-workflow-inputdefault.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: c7c97715b400ff2194aa29fc211d3401cea3a9bf

What is MAnorm? -------------- MAnorm is a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets of TFs (transcription factors) or epigenetic modifications and you can use it for: * Normalization of two ChIP-seq samples * Quantitative comparison (differential analysis) of two ChIP-seq samples * Evaluating the overlap enrichment of the protein binding sites(peaks) * Elucidating underlying mechanisms of cell-type specific gene regulation How MAnorm works? ---------------- MAnorm uses common peaks of two samples as a reference to build the rescaling model for normalization, which is based on the empirical assumption that if a chromatin-associated protein has a substantial number of peaks shared in two conditions, the binding at these common regions will tend to be determined by similar mechanisms, and thus should exhibit similar global binding intensities across samples. The observed differences on common peaks are presumed to reflect the scaling relationship of ChIP-Seq signals between two samples, which can be applied to all peaks. What do the inputs mean? ---------------- ### General **Experiment short name/Alias** * short name for you experiment to identify among the others **ChIP-Seq SE sample 1** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq single-read experiment to be used as Sample 1 **ChIP-Seq SE sample 2** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq single-read experiment to be used as Sample 2 **Genome** * Reference genome to be used for gene assigning ### Advanced **Reads shift size for sample 1** * This value is used to shift reads towards 3' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **Reads shift size for sample 2** * This value is used to shift reads towards 5' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff** * Absolute M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff to define biased (differential binding) peaks. Default: 1.0 **P-value cutoff** * P-value cutoff to define biased peaks. Default: 0.01 **Window size** * Window size to count reads and calculate read densities. 2000 is recommended for sharp histone marks like H3K4me3 and H3K27ac, and 1000 for TFs or DNase-seq. Default: 2000

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/manorm-se.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 4f48ee6f8665a34cdf96e89c012ee807f80c7a3d

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/germline_wgs.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 3ee63d8757c341ca98b3b46ec4782862ad19b710

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/count-lines7-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 75271e2a0887d47cca4077b60dd51ac763c09b63

Cross-Linking ImmunoPrecipitation ================================= `CLIP` (`cross-linking immunoprecipitation`) is a method used in molecular biology that combines UV cross-linking with immunoprecipitation in order to analyse protein interactions with RNA or to precisely locate RNA modifications (e.g. m6A). (Uhl|Houwaart|Corrado|Wright|Backofen|2017)(Ule|Jensen|Ruggiu|Mele|2003)(Sugimoto|König|Hussain|Zupan|2012)(Zhang|Darnell|2011) (Ke| Alemu| Mertens| Gantman|2015) CLIP-based techniques can be used to map RNA binding protein binding sites or RNA modification sites (Ke| Alemu| Mertens| Gantman|2015)(Ke| Pandya-Jones| Saito| Fak|2017) of interest on a genome-wide scale, thereby increasing the understanding of post-transcriptional regulatory networks. The identification of sites where RNA-binding proteins (RNABPs) interact with target RNAs opens the door to understanding the vast complexity of RNA regulation. UV cross-linking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) is a transformative technology in which RNAs purified from _in vivo_ cross-linked RNA-protein complexes are sequenced to reveal footprints of RNABP:RNA contacts. CLIP combined with high-throughput sequencing (HITS-CLIP) is a generalizable strategy to produce transcriptome-wide maps of RNA binding with higher accuracy and resolution than standard RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) profiling or purely computational approaches. The application of CLIP to Argonaute proteins has expanded the utility of this approach to mapping binding sites for microRNAs and other small regulatory RNAs. Finally, recent advances in data analysis take advantage of cross-link–induced mutation sites (CIMS) to refine RNA-binding maps to single-nucleotide resolution. Once IP conditions are established, HITS-CLIP takes ~8 d to prepare RNA for sequencing. Established pipelines for data analysis, including those for CIMS, take 3–4 d. Workflow -------- CLIP begins with the in-vivo cross-linking of RNA-protein complexes using ultraviolet light (UV). Upon UV exposure, covalent bonds are formed between proteins and nucleic acids that are in close proximity. (Darnell|2012) The cross-linked cells are then lysed, and the protein of interest is isolated via immunoprecipitation. In order to allow for sequence specific priming of reverse transcription, RNA adapters are ligated to the 3' ends, while radiolabeled phosphates are transferred to the 5' ends of the RNA fragments. The RNA-protein complexes are then separated from free RNA using gel electrophoresis and membrane transfer. Proteinase K digestion is then performed in order to remove protein from the RNA-protein complexes. This step leaves a peptide at the cross-link site, allowing for the identification of the cross-linked nucleotide. (König| McGlincy| Ule|2012) After ligating RNA linkers to the RNA 5' ends, cDNA is synthesized via RT-PCR. High-throughput sequencing is then used to generate reads containing distinct barcodes that identify the last cDNA nucleotide. Interaction sites can be identified by mapping the reads back to the transcriptome.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/clipseq-se.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 7eef0294395d83ff0765fce61726a59d71126422

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/detect_variants_wgs.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: d3e4bf55753cd92f97537c7d701187ea92d1e5f0

Pairwise comparison

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_kmer_compare_wnode.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 2afb5ebafd1353ba063cc74ee9a7eaf347afce5c

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_kmer_top_n_extract.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 192b813eed8c0d368e69057cb39415175dd15128

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-utils.git

Path: testdata/scatter-wf2_v1_2.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: c1875d54dedc41b1d2fa08634dcf1caa8f1bc631

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-utils.git

Path: testdata/step-valuefrom3-wf_v1_0.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: c1875d54dedc41b1d2fa08634dcf1caa8f1bc631