Explore Workflows

View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own

Graph Name Retrieved From View
workflow graph Generate genome indices for STAR & bowtie

Creates indices for: * [STAR](https://github.com/alexdobin/STAR) v2.5.3a (03/17/2017) PMID: [23104886](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23104886) * [bowtie](http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/tutorial.shtml) v1.2.0 (12/30/2016) It performs the following steps: 1. `STAR --runMode genomeGenerate` to generate indices, based on [FASTA](http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/FASTA/) and [GTF](http://mblab.wustl.edu/GTF2.html) input files, returns results as an array of files 2. Outputs indices as [Direcotry](http://www.commonwl.org/v1.0/CommandLineTool.html#Directory) data type 3. Separates *chrNameLength.txt* file from Directory output 4. `bowtie-build` to generate indices requires genome [FASTA](http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/FASTA/) file as input, returns results as a group of main and secondary files

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/genome-indices.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: ad948b2691ef7f0f34de38f0102c3cd6f5182b29

workflow graph cnv_gridss

CNV GRIDSS calling

https://gitlab.bsc.es/lrodrig1/structuralvariants_poc.git

Path: structuralvariants/cwl/abstract_operations/subworkflows/cnv_gridss.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 9ac2d150a57d1996210ed6a44dd0c0404dab383c

workflow graph Motif Finding with HOMER from FASTA files

Motif Finding with HOMER from FASTA files --------------------------------------------------- HOMER contains a novel motif discovery algorithm that was designed for regulatory element analysis in genomics applications (DNA only, no protein). It is a differential motif discovery algorithm, which means that it takes two sets of sequences and tries to identify the regulatory elements that are specifically enriched in on set relative to the other. It uses ZOOPS scoring (zero or one occurrence per sequence) coupled with the hypergeometric enrichment calculations (or binomial) to determine motif enrichment. HOMER also tries its best to account for sequenced bias in the dataset. It was designed with ChIP-Seq and promoter analysis in mind, but can be applied to pretty much any nucleic acids motif finding problem. For more information please refer to: ------------------------------------- [Official documentation](http://homer.ucsd.edu/homer/motif/)

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/homer-motif-analysis.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: ad948b2691ef7f0f34de38f0102c3cd6f5182b29

workflow graph Super-enhancer post ChIP-Seq analysis

Super-enhancers, consist of clusters of enhancers that are densely occupied by the master regulators and Mediator. Super-enhancers differ from typical enhancers in size, transcription factor density and content, ability to activate transcription, and sensitivity to perturbation. Use to create stitched enhancers, and to separate super-enhancers from typical enhancers using sequencing data (.bam) given a file of previously identified constituent enhancers (.gff)

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/super-enhancer.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 6bf56698c6fe6e781723dea32bc922b91ef49cf3

workflow graph Subsample BAM file creating a tagAlign and pseudoreplicates

This workflow creates a subsample from a BAM file creating a tagAlign and pseudoreplicates

https://github.com/ncbi/cwl-ngs-workflows-cbb.git

Path: workflows/File-formats/subample-pseudoreplicates.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 11f70a71cb68b3960c2d410ba1fdcd3b8a7e1419

workflow graph Motif Finding with HOMER with custom background regions

Motif Finding with HOMER with custom background regions --------------------------------------------------- HOMER contains a novel motif discovery algorithm that was designed for regulatory element analysis in genomics applications (DNA only, no protein). It is a differential motif discovery algorithm, which means that it takes two sets of sequences and tries to identify the regulatory elements that are specifically enriched in on set relative to the other. It uses ZOOPS scoring (zero or one occurrence per sequence) coupled with the hypergeometric enrichment calculations (or binomial) to determine motif enrichment. HOMER also tries its best to account for sequenced bias in the dataset. It was designed with ChIP-Seq and promoter analysis in mind, but can be applied to pretty much any nucleic acids motif finding problem. For more information please refer to: ------------------------------------- [Official documentation](http://homer.ucsd.edu/homer/motif/)

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/homer-motif-analysis-bg.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 1a46cb0e8f973481fe5ae3ae6188a41622c8532e

workflow graph gcaccess_from_list

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_gcaccess_from_list.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: d218e081d8f6a4fdab56a38ce0fc2fae6216cecc

workflow graph Cell Ranger ARC Aggregate

Cell Ranger ARC Aggregate =========================

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/cellranger-arc-aggr.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 1a46cb0e8f973481fe5ae3ae6188a41622c8532e

workflow graph MAnorm SE - quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq single-read data

What is MAnorm? -------------- MAnorm is a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets of TFs (transcription factors) or epigenetic modifications and you can use it for: * Normalization of two ChIP-seq samples * Quantitative comparison (differential analysis) of two ChIP-seq samples * Evaluating the overlap enrichment of the protein binding sites(peaks) * Elucidating underlying mechanisms of cell-type specific gene regulation How MAnorm works? ---------------- MAnorm uses common peaks of two samples as a reference to build the rescaling model for normalization, which is based on the empirical assumption that if a chromatin-associated protein has a substantial number of peaks shared in two conditions, the binding at these common regions will tend to be determined by similar mechanisms, and thus should exhibit similar global binding intensities across samples. The observed differences on common peaks are presumed to reflect the scaling relationship of ChIP-Seq signals between two samples, which can be applied to all peaks. What do the inputs mean? ---------------- ### General **Experiment short name/Alias** * short name for you experiment to identify among the others **ChIP-Seq SE sample 1** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq single-read experiment to be used as Sample 1 **ChIP-Seq SE sample 2** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq single-read experiment to be used as Sample 2 **Genome** * Reference genome to be used for gene assigning ### Advanced **Reads shift size for sample 1** * This value is used to shift reads towards 3' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **Reads shift size for sample 2** * This value is used to shift reads towards 5' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff** * Absolute M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff to define biased (differential binding) peaks. Default: 1.0 **P-value cutoff** * P-value cutoff to define biased peaks. Default: 0.01 **Window size** * Window size to count reads and calculate read densities. 2000 is recommended for sharp histone marks like H3K4me3 and H3K27ac, and 1000 for TFs or DNase-seq. Default: 2000

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/manorm-se.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 1a46cb0e8f973481fe5ae3ae6188a41622c8532e

workflow graph cnv_manta

CNV Manta calling

https://gitlab.bsc.es/lrodrig1/structuralvariants_poc.git

Path: structuralvariants/cwl/subworkflows/cnv_manta.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 572d9e6b9264d98967b33d18110b0e1979b21d6c