Explore Workflows

View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own

Graph Name Retrieved From View
workflow graph alignment_novoalign.cwl

https://github.com/uc-cdis/genomel_pipelines.git

Path: genomel/cwl/workflows/harmonization/alignment_novoalign.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: f55f0011de7db66f873ffb0f700f3fe26b33911e

workflow graph allele-process-strain.cwl

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: subworkflows/allele-process-strain.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 02ffbbd7eb8e06bfb759edea440f78bdc8bb2631

workflow graph 1st-workflow.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: tests/wf/1st-workflow.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 20d664eff23e59aa57908345bfdb1ceeab3438f2

workflow graph SoupX (workflow) - an R package for the estimation and removal of cell free mRNA contamination

Wrapped in a workflow SoupX tool for easy access to Cell Ranger pipeline compressed outputs.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: tools/soupx-subworkflow.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 2c486543c335bb99b245dfe7e2f033f535efb9cf

workflow graph extract_readgroup_fastq_se_http.cwl

https://github.com/nci-gdc/gdc-dnaseq-cwl.git

Path: workflows/bamfastq_align/extract_readgroup_fastq_se_http.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 0495e3095182b2e1b4d6274833b3d2ce30347a4e

workflow graph scatter-valuefrom-wf4.cwl#main

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/scatter-valuefrom-wf4.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: e59538cd9899a88d7e31e0f259bc56734f604383

Packed ID: main

workflow graph merge-bam-parallel

This workflow merge BAM files per condition in parallel

https://github.com/ncbi/cwl-ngs-workflows-cbb.git

Path: workflows/File-formats/merge-bam-parallel.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: e541470bc9d0b064bc4ed7dd2b45d8ec67760613

workflow graph cache_test_workflow.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: tests/wf/cache_test_workflow.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 20d664eff23e59aa57908345bfdb1ceeab3438f2

workflow graph advanced-header.cwl

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: metadata/advanced-header.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 2f0db4b3c515f91c5cfda19c78cf90d339390986

workflow graph DESeq2 (LRT) - differential gene expression analysis using likelihood ratio test

Runs DESeq2 using LRT (Likelihood Ratio Test) ============================================= The LRT examines two models for the counts, a full model with a certain number of terms and a reduced model, in which some of the terms of the full model are removed. The test determines if the increased likelihood of the data using the extra terms in the full model is more than expected if those extra terms are truly zero. The LRT is therefore useful for testing multiple terms at once, for example testing 3 or more levels of a factor at once, or all interactions between two variables. The LRT for count data is conceptually similar to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculation in linear regression, except that in the case of the Negative Binomial GLM, we use an analysis of deviance (ANODEV), where the deviance captures the difference in likelihood between a full and a reduced model. When one performs a likelihood ratio test, the p values and the test statistic (the stat column) are values for the test that removes all of the variables which are present in the full design and not in the reduced design. This tests the null hypothesis that all the coefficients from these variables and levels of these factors are equal to zero. The likelihood ratio test p values therefore represent a test of all the variables and all the levels of factors which are among these variables. However, the results table only has space for one column of log fold change, so a single variable and a single comparison is shown (among the potentially multiple log fold changes which were tested in the likelihood ratio test). This indicates that the p value is for the likelihood ratio test of all the variables and all the levels, while the log fold change is a single comparison from among those variables and levels. **Technical notes** 1. At least two biological replicates are required for every compared category 2. Metadata file describes relations between compared experiments, for example ``` ,time,condition DH1,day5,WT DH2,day5,KO DH3,day7,WT DH4,day7,KO DH5,day7,KO ``` where `time, condition, day5, day7, WT, KO` should be a single words (without spaces) and `DH1, DH2, DH3, DH4, DH5` correspond to the experiment aliases set in **RNA-Seq experiments** input. 3. Design and reduced formulas should start with **~** and include categories or, optionally, their interactions from the metadata file header. See details in DESeq2 manual [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#interactions) and [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#likelihood-ratio-test) 4. Contrast should be set based on your metadata file header and available categories in a form of `Factor Numerator Denominator`, where `Factor` - column name from metadata file, `Numerator` - category from metadata file to be used as numerator in fold change calculation, `Denominator` - category from metadata file to be used as denominator in fold change calculation. For example `condition WT KO`.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq-lrt.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 104059e07a2964673e21d371763e33c0afeb2d03