Explore Workflows

View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own

Graph Name Retrieved From View
workflow graph super-enhancer.cwl

Both `islands_file` and `islands_control_file` should be produced by the same cwl tool (iaintersect.cwl or macs2-callpeak-biowardrobe-only.cwl)

https://github.com/Barski-lab/workflows.git

Path: workflows/super-enhancer.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 1d45ce42181dfce7aceec8bc99a3730eb5285948

workflow graph assemble.cwl

Assemble a set of reads using SKESA

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: assemble.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 505b91e41741ccbcd5ebd2b6a09a3be604f9ece3

workflow graph MAnorm PE - quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq paired-end data

What is MAnorm? -------------- MAnorm is a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets of TFs (transcription factors) or epigenetic modifications and you can use it for: * Normalization of two ChIP-seq samples * Quantitative comparison (differential analysis) of two ChIP-seq samples * Evaluating the overlap enrichment of the protein binding sites(peaks) * Elucidating underlying mechanisms of cell-type specific gene regulation How MAnorm works? ---------------- MAnorm uses common peaks of two samples as a reference to build the rescaling model for normalization, which is based on the empirical assumption that if a chromatin-associated protein has a substantial number of peaks shared in two conditions, the binding at these common regions will tend to be determined by similar mechanisms, and thus should exhibit similar global binding intensities across samples. The observed differences on common peaks are presumed to reflect the scaling relationship of ChIP-Seq signals between two samples, which can be applied to all peaks. What do the inputs mean? ---------------- ### General **Experiment short name/Alias** * short name for you experiment to identify among the others **ChIP-Seq PE sample 1** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq paired-end experiment to be used as Sample 1 **ChIP-Seq PE sample 2** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq paired-end experiment to be used as Sample 2 **Genome** * Reference genome to be used for gene assigning ### Advanced **Reads shift size for sample 1** * This value is used to shift reads towards 3' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **Reads shift size for sample 2** * This value is used to shift reads towards 5' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff** * Absolute M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff to define biased (differential binding) peaks. Default: 1.0 **P-value cutoff** * P-value cutoff to define biased peaks. Default: 0.01 **Window size** * Window size to count reads and calculate read densities. 2000 is recommended for sharp histone marks like H3K4me3 and H3K27ac, and 1000 for TFs or DNase-seq. Default: 2000

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/manorm-pe.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 935a78f1aff757f977de4e3672aefead3b23606b

workflow graph Motif Finding with HOMER with target and background regions from peaks

Motif Finding with HOMER with target and background regions from peaks --------------------------------------------------- HOMER contains a novel motif discovery algorithm that was designed for regulatory element analysis in genomics applications (DNA only, no protein). It is a differential motif discovery algorithm, which means that it takes two sets of sequences and tries to identify the regulatory elements that are specifically enriched in on set relative to the other. It uses ZOOPS scoring (zero or one occurrence per sequence) coupled with the hypergeometric enrichment calculations (or binomial) to determine motif enrichment. HOMER also tries its best to account for sequenced bias in the dataset. It was designed with ChIP-Seq and promoter analysis in mind, but can be applied to pretty much any nucleic acids motif finding problem. For more information please refer to: ------------------------------------- [Official documentation](http://homer.ucsd.edu/homer/motif/)

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/homer-motif-analysis-peak.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 935a78f1aff757f977de4e3672aefead3b23606b

workflow graph varscan somatic workflow

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/subworkflows/varscan.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 6b365b79675b2aabfb8d5829bb8df0a6e986b037

workflow graph Cut-n-Run pipeline paired-end

Experimental pipeline for Cut-n-Run analysis. Uses mapping results from the following experiment types: - `chipseq-pe.cwl` - `trim-chipseq-pe.cwl` - `trim-atacseq-pe.cwl` Note, the upstream analyses should not have duplicates removed

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/trim-chipseq-pe-cut-n-run.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 4a5c59829ff8b9f3c843e66e3c675dcd9c689ed5

workflow graph workflow.cwl

https://github.com/NAL-i5K/Organism_Onboarding.git

Path: flow_dispatch/workflow.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 8b8c6dd16e06b43fbb50f1c0821856a31f1bbbc5

workflow graph vardictSomaticVariantCaller_v0_1_0.cwl

https://github.com/PMCC-BioinformaticsCore/janis-pipelines.git

Path: janis_pipelines/wgs_somatic/cwl/tools/vardictSomaticVariantCaller_v0_1_0.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: d3ae7483f860339a12c5f404de9db0f026571f77

workflow graph Bismark Methylation - pipeline for BS-Seq data analysis

Sequence reads are first cleaned from adapters and transformed into fully bisulfite-converted forward (C->T) and reverse read (G->A conversion of the forward strand) versions, before they are aligned to similarly converted versions of the genome (also C->T and G->A converted). Sequence reads that produce a unique best alignment from the four alignment processes against the bisulfite genomes (which are running in parallel) are then compared to the normal genomic sequence and the methylation state of all cytosine positions in the read is inferred. A read is considered to align uniquely if an alignment has a unique best alignment score (as reported by the AS:i field). If a read produces several alignments with the same number of mismatches or with the same alignment score (AS:i field), a read (or a read-pair) is discarded altogether. On the next step we extract the methylation call for every single C analysed. The position of every single C will be written out to a new output file, depending on its context (CpG, CHG or CHH), whereby methylated Cs will be labelled as forward reads (+), non-methylated Cs as reverse reads (-). The output of the methylation extractor is then transformed into a bedGraph and coverage file. The bedGraph counts output is then used to generate a genome-wide cytosine report which reports the number on every single CpG (optionally every single cytosine) in the genome, irrespective of whether it was covered by any reads or not. As this type of report is informative for cytosines on both strands the output may be fairly large (~46mn CpG positions or >1.2bn total cytosine positions in the human genome).

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/bismark-methylation-se.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 9e3c3e65c19873cd1ed3cf7cc3b94ebc75ae0cc5

workflow graph blastp_wnode_naming

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_blastp_wnode_naming.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 2801ce53744a085580a8de91cd007c45146b51e8