Explore Workflows
View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own
Graph | Name | Retrieved From | View |
---|---|---|---|
super-enhancer.cwl
Both `islands_file` and `islands_control_file` should be produced by the same cwl tool (iaintersect.cwl or macs2-callpeak-biowardrobe-only.cwl) |
https://github.com/Barski-lab/workflows.git
Path: workflows/super-enhancer.cwl Branch/Commit ID: 1d45ce42181dfce7aceec8bc99a3730eb5285948 |
||
assemble.cwl
Assemble a set of reads using SKESA |
https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git
Path: assemble.cwl Branch/Commit ID: 505b91e41741ccbcd5ebd2b6a09a3be604f9ece3 |
||
MAnorm PE - quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq paired-end data
What is MAnorm? -------------- MAnorm is a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets of TFs (transcription factors) or epigenetic modifications and you can use it for: * Normalization of two ChIP-seq samples * Quantitative comparison (differential analysis) of two ChIP-seq samples * Evaluating the overlap enrichment of the protein binding sites(peaks) * Elucidating underlying mechanisms of cell-type specific gene regulation How MAnorm works? ---------------- MAnorm uses common peaks of two samples as a reference to build the rescaling model for normalization, which is based on the empirical assumption that if a chromatin-associated protein has a substantial number of peaks shared in two conditions, the binding at these common regions will tend to be determined by similar mechanisms, and thus should exhibit similar global binding intensities across samples. The observed differences on common peaks are presumed to reflect the scaling relationship of ChIP-Seq signals between two samples, which can be applied to all peaks. What do the inputs mean? ---------------- ### General **Experiment short name/Alias** * short name for you experiment to identify among the others **ChIP-Seq PE sample 1** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq paired-end experiment to be used as Sample 1 **ChIP-Seq PE sample 2** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq paired-end experiment to be used as Sample 2 **Genome** * Reference genome to be used for gene assigning ### Advanced **Reads shift size for sample 1** * This value is used to shift reads towards 3' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **Reads shift size for sample 2** * This value is used to shift reads towards 5' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff** * Absolute M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff to define biased (differential binding) peaks. Default: 1.0 **P-value cutoff** * P-value cutoff to define biased peaks. Default: 0.01 **Window size** * Window size to count reads and calculate read densities. 2000 is recommended for sharp histone marks like H3K4me3 and H3K27ac, and 1000 for TFs or DNase-seq. Default: 2000 |
https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git
Path: workflows/manorm-pe.cwl Branch/Commit ID: 935a78f1aff757f977de4e3672aefead3b23606b |
||
Motif Finding with HOMER with target and background regions from peaks
Motif Finding with HOMER with target and background regions from peaks --------------------------------------------------- HOMER contains a novel motif discovery algorithm that was designed for regulatory element analysis in genomics applications (DNA only, no protein). It is a differential motif discovery algorithm, which means that it takes two sets of sequences and tries to identify the regulatory elements that are specifically enriched in on set relative to the other. It uses ZOOPS scoring (zero or one occurrence per sequence) coupled with the hypergeometric enrichment calculations (or binomial) to determine motif enrichment. HOMER also tries its best to account for sequenced bias in the dataset. It was designed with ChIP-Seq and promoter analysis in mind, but can be applied to pretty much any nucleic acids motif finding problem. For more information please refer to: ------------------------------------- [Official documentation](http://homer.ucsd.edu/homer/motif/) |
https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git
Path: workflows/homer-motif-analysis-peak.cwl Branch/Commit ID: 935a78f1aff757f977de4e3672aefead3b23606b |
||
varscan somatic workflow
|
https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git
Path: definitions/subworkflows/varscan.cwl Branch/Commit ID: 6b365b79675b2aabfb8d5829bb8df0a6e986b037 |
||
Cut-n-Run pipeline paired-end
Experimental pipeline for Cut-n-Run analysis. Uses mapping results from the following experiment types: - `chipseq-pe.cwl` - `trim-chipseq-pe.cwl` - `trim-atacseq-pe.cwl` Note, the upstream analyses should not have duplicates removed |
https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git
Path: workflows/trim-chipseq-pe-cut-n-run.cwl Branch/Commit ID: 4a5c59829ff8b9f3c843e66e3c675dcd9c689ed5 |
||
workflow.cwl
|
https://github.com/NAL-i5K/Organism_Onboarding.git
Path: flow_dispatch/workflow.cwl Branch/Commit ID: 8b8c6dd16e06b43fbb50f1c0821856a31f1bbbc5 |
||
vardictSomaticVariantCaller_v0_1_0.cwl
|
https://github.com/PMCC-BioinformaticsCore/janis-pipelines.git
Path: janis_pipelines/wgs_somatic/cwl/tools/vardictSomaticVariantCaller_v0_1_0.cwl Branch/Commit ID: d3ae7483f860339a12c5f404de9db0f026571f77 |
||
Bismark Methylation - pipeline for BS-Seq data analysis
Sequence reads are first cleaned from adapters and transformed into fully bisulfite-converted forward (C->T) and reverse read (G->A conversion of the forward strand) versions, before they are aligned to similarly converted versions of the genome (also C->T and G->A converted). Sequence reads that produce a unique best alignment from the four alignment processes against the bisulfite genomes (which are running in parallel) are then compared to the normal genomic sequence and the methylation state of all cytosine positions in the read is inferred. A read is considered to align uniquely if an alignment has a unique best alignment score (as reported by the AS:i field). If a read produces several alignments with the same number of mismatches or with the same alignment score (AS:i field), a read (or a read-pair) is discarded altogether. On the next step we extract the methylation call for every single C analysed. The position of every single C will be written out to a new output file, depending on its context (CpG, CHG or CHH), whereby methylated Cs will be labelled as forward reads (+), non-methylated Cs as reverse reads (-). The output of the methylation extractor is then transformed into a bedGraph and coverage file. The bedGraph counts output is then used to generate a genome-wide cytosine report which reports the number on every single CpG (optionally every single cytosine) in the genome, irrespective of whether it was covered by any reads or not. As this type of report is informative for cytosines on both strands the output may be fairly large (~46mn CpG positions or >1.2bn total cytosine positions in the human genome). |
https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git
Path: workflows/bismark-methylation-se.cwl Branch/Commit ID: 9e3c3e65c19873cd1ed3cf7cc3b94ebc75ae0cc5 |
||
blastp_wnode_naming
|
https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git
Path: task_types/tt_blastp_wnode_naming.cwl Branch/Commit ID: 2801ce53744a085580a8de91cd007c45146b51e8 |