Explore Workflows

View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own

Graph Name Retrieved From View
workflow graph DESeq - differential gene expression analysis

Differential gene expression analysis ===================================== Differential gene expression analysis based on the negative binomial distribution Estimate variance-mean dependence in count data from high-throughput sequencing assays and test for differential expression based on a model using the negative binomial distribution. DESeq1 ------ High-throughput sequencing assays such as RNA-Seq, ChIP-Seq or barcode counting provide quantitative readouts in the form of count data. To infer differential signal in such data correctly and with good statistical power, estimation of data variability throughout the dynamic range and a suitable error model are required. Simon Anders and Wolfgang Huber propose a method based on the negative binomial distribution, with variance and mean linked by local regression and present an implementation, [DESeq](http://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq.html), as an R/Bioconductor package DESeq2 ------ In comparative high-throughput sequencing assays, a fundamental task is the analysis of count data, such as read counts per gene in RNA-seq, for evidence of systematic changes across experimental conditions. Small replicate numbers, discreteness, large dynamic range and the presence of outliers require a suitable statistical approach. [DESeq2](http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html), a method for differential analysis of count data, using shrinkage estimation for dispersions and fold changes to improve stability and interpretability of estimates. This enables a more quantitative analysis focused on the strength rather than the mere presence of differential expression.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 8bf36bfad5624fbc8fc315e82783a44e9e5e4470

workflow graph msa.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-lab/2020-covid-19-bh.git

Path: msa/msa.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 8fd2d9814a5641a55efd8e63fa65a652b66f9d0b

workflow graph count-lines10-wf.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/count-lines10-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 0db44e3c9805a070564f954222efff71cd791b70

workflow graph revsort.cwl

Reverse the lines in a document, then sort those lines.

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: tests/wf/revsort.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 0e8110083bad6ea98fc487aa262953a6c5e010b5

workflow graph BlastP_RBH_workflow

https://github.com/ncbi/cwl-demos.git

Path: blast-pipelines/blast_workflow.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 496b3e2bff8c20d5a7d5c3cbe9b64697767b1c13

workflow graph Cell Ranger Build Reference Indices

Cell Ranger Build Reference Indices ===================================

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/cellranger-mkref.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 1a46cb0e8f973481fe5ae3ae6188a41622c8532e

workflow graph default-wf5.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: tests/wf/default-wf5.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 1441c285e8a5afe399f5d52ca9059cb8bb513edb

workflow graph scatter-valuefrom-wf2.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/scatter-valuefrom-wf2.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 26870e38cec81af880cd3e4789ae6cee8fc27020

workflow graph MAnorm SE - quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq single-read data

What is MAnorm? -------------- MAnorm is a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets of TFs (transcription factors) or epigenetic modifications and you can use it for: * Normalization of two ChIP-seq samples * Quantitative comparison (differential analysis) of two ChIP-seq samples * Evaluating the overlap enrichment of the protein binding sites(peaks) * Elucidating underlying mechanisms of cell-type specific gene regulation How MAnorm works? ---------------- MAnorm uses common peaks of two samples as a reference to build the rescaling model for normalization, which is based on the empirical assumption that if a chromatin-associated protein has a substantial number of peaks shared in two conditions, the binding at these common regions will tend to be determined by similar mechanisms, and thus should exhibit similar global binding intensities across samples. The observed differences on common peaks are presumed to reflect the scaling relationship of ChIP-Seq signals between two samples, which can be applied to all peaks. What do the inputs mean? ---------------- ### General **Experiment short name/Alias** * short name for you experiment to identify among the others **ChIP-Seq SE sample 1** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq single-read experiment to be used as Sample 1 **ChIP-Seq SE sample 2** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq single-read experiment to be used as Sample 2 **Genome** * Reference genome to be used for gene assigning ### Advanced **Reads shift size for sample 1** * This value is used to shift reads towards 3' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **Reads shift size for sample 2** * This value is used to shift reads towards 5' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff** * Absolute M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff to define biased (differential binding) peaks. Default: 1.0 **P-value cutoff** * P-value cutoff to define biased peaks. Default: 0.01 **Window size** * Window size to count reads and calculate read densities. 2000 is recommended for sharp histone marks like H3K4me3 and H3K27ac, and 1000 for TFs or DNase-seq. Default: 2000

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/manorm-se.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: a409db2289b86779897ff19003bd351701a81c50

workflow graph Prepare user input

Prepare user input for NCBI-PGAP pipeline

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: prepare_user_input2.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 4b73bfeb967ee9f57a0410276f7c39e784f0846f