Explore Workflows

Runs DESeq2 using LRT (Likelihood Ratio Test) ============================================= The LRT examines two models for the counts, a full model with a certain number of terms and a reduced model, in which some of the terms of the full model are removed. The test determines if the increased likelihood of the data using the extra terms in the full model is more than expected if those extra terms are truly zero. The LRT is therefore useful for testing multiple terms at once, for example testing 3 or more levels of a factor at once, or all interactions between two variables. The LRT for count data is conceptually similar to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculation in linear regression, except that in the case of the Negative Binomial GLM, we use an analysis of deviance (ANODEV), where the deviance captures the difference in likelihood between a full and a reduced model. When one performs a likelihood ratio test, the p values and the test statistic (the stat column) are values for the test that removes all of the variables which are present in the full design and not in the reduced design. This tests the null hypothesis that all the coefficients from these variables and levels of these factors are equal to zero. The likelihood ratio test p values therefore represent a test of all the variables and all the levels of factors which are among these variables. However, the results table only has space for one column of log fold change, so a single variable and a single comparison is shown (among the potentially multiple log fold changes which were tested in the likelihood ratio test). This indicates that the p value is for the likelihood ratio test of all the variables and all the levels, while the log fold change is a single comparison from among those variables and levels. **Technical notes** 1. At least two biological replicates are required for every compared category 2. Metadata file describes relations between compared experiments, for example ``` ,time,condition DH1,day5,WT DH2,day5,KO DH3,day7,WT DH4,day7,KO DH5,day7,KO ``` where `time, condition, day5, day7, WT, KO` should be a single words (without spaces) and `DH1, DH2, DH3, DH4, DH5` correspond to the experiment aliases set in **RNA-Seq experiments** input. 3. Design and reduced formulas should start with **~** and include categories or, optionally, their interactions from the metadata file header. See details in DESeq2 manual [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#interactions) and [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#likelihood-ratio-test) 4. Contrast should be set based on your metadata file header and available categories in a form of `Factor Numerator Denominator`, where `Factor` - column name from metadata file, `Numerator` - category from metadata file to be used as numerator in fold change calculation, `Denominator` - category from metadata file to be used as denominator in fold change calculation. For example `condition WT KO`.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq-lrt.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 10ce6e113f749c7bd725e426445220c3bdc5ddf1

https://github.com/mskcc/ACCESS-Pipeline.git

Path: workflows/module-4.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 5bf88423593441e4bf6b432111160446cd8dcf13

https://github.com/fjrmoreews/cwl-workflow-SARS-CoV-2.git

Path: PreProcessing/preprocess-illumina.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: e586b8a7872b95ee6163229533873b7ba15609a7

https://github.com/andurill/ACCESS-Pipeline.git

Path: workflows/module-1.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: f8b57834ad0ce78e4d5bdd90ed0991923685d87f

BAM filtering

https://gitlab.bsc.es/lrodrig1/structuralvariants_poc.git

Path: structuralvariants/subworkflows/bam_filtering.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 5cc8306ce84c027db4c092077983294557213136

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: progs/protein_extract.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 61eaea2f746c8a1fc2a2b731056b068e28ca4e20

Modified original [BioWardrobe's](https://biowardrobe.com) [PubMed ID:26248465](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248465) **RNA-Seq** basic analysis for a **pair-end** experiment. A corresponded input [FASTQ](http://maq.sourceforge.net/fastq.shtml) file has to be provided. Current workflow should be used only with the single-end RNA-Seq data. It performs the following steps: 1. Trim adapters from input FASTQ files 2. Use STAR to align reads from input FASTQ files according to the predefined reference indices; generate unsorted BAM file and alignment statistics file 3. Use fastx_quality_stats to analyze input FASTQ files and generate quality statistics files 4. Use samtools sort to generate coordinate sorted BAM(+BAI) file pair from the unsorted BAM file obtained on the step 1 (after running STAR) 5. Generate BigWig file on the base of sorted BAM file 6. Map input FASTQ files to predefined rRNA reference indices using Bowtie to define the level of rRNA contamination; export resulted statistics to file 7. Calculate isoform expression level for the sorted BAM file and GTF/TAB annotation file using GEEP reads-counting utility; export results to file

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/trim-rnaseq-pe-dutp.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: e45ab1b9ac5c9b99fdf7b3b1be396dc42c2c9620

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/scatter-wf4.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: fec7a10466a26e376b14181a88734983cfb1b8cb

Packed ID: main

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/step-valuefrom2-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 7bfd77118cdc80dd7150115dd7a1a7ee6046f6fe

Motif Finding with HOMER with custom background regions --------------------------------------------------- HOMER contains a novel motif discovery algorithm that was designed for regulatory element analysis in genomics applications (DNA only, no protein). It is a differential motif discovery algorithm, which means that it takes two sets of sequences and tries to identify the regulatory elements that are specifically enriched in on set relative to the other. It uses ZOOPS scoring (zero or one occurrence per sequence) coupled with the hypergeometric enrichment calculations (or binomial) to determine motif enrichment. HOMER also tries its best to account for sequenced bias in the dataset. It was designed with ChIP-Seq and promoter analysis in mind, but can be applied to pretty much any nucleic acids motif finding problem. For more information please refer to: ------------------------------------- [Official documentation](http://homer.ucsd.edu/homer/motif/)

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/homer-motif-analysis-bg.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 92f1a6da9c4f85fb51340b01b32373a50fde0891