Explore Workflows

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_kmer_cache_retrieve.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 7f857f7f2d7c080d27c775b67a6d6f7d94bce31f

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/gathered_downsample_and_recall.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 35e6b3ef71b4a2a9caba1dbd5dc424a8809bcc0a

Runs DESeq2 using LRT (Likelihood Ratio Test) ============================================= The LRT examines two models for the counts, a full model with a certain number of terms and a reduced model, in which some of the terms of the full model are removed. The test determines if the increased likelihood of the data using the extra terms in the full model is more than expected if those extra terms are truly zero. The LRT is therefore useful for testing multiple terms at once, for example testing 3 or more levels of a factor at once, or all interactions between two variables. The LRT for count data is conceptually similar to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculation in linear regression, except that in the case of the Negative Binomial GLM, we use an analysis of deviance (ANODEV), where the deviance captures the difference in likelihood between a full and a reduced model. When one performs a likelihood ratio test, the p values and the test statistic (the stat column) are values for the test that removes all of the variables which are present in the full design and not in the reduced design. This tests the null hypothesis that all the coefficients from these variables and levels of these factors are equal to zero. The likelihood ratio test p values therefore represent a test of all the variables and all the levels of factors which are among these variables. However, the results table only has space for one column of log fold change, so a single variable and a single comparison is shown (among the potentially multiple log fold changes which were tested in the likelihood ratio test). This indicates that the p value is for the likelihood ratio test of all the variables and all the levels, while the log fold change is a single comparison from among those variables and levels. **Technical notes** 1. At least two biological replicates are required for every compared category 2. Metadata file describes relations between compared experiments, for example ``` ,time,condition DH1,day5,WT DH2,day5,KO DH3,day7,WT DH4,day7,KO DH5,day7,KO ``` where `time, condition, day5, day7, WT, KO` should be a single words (without spaces) and `DH1, DH2, DH3, DH4, DH5` correspond to the experiment aliases set in **RNA-Seq experiments** input. 3. Design and reduced formulas should start with **~** and include categories or, optionally, their interactions from the metadata file header. See details in DESeq2 manual [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#interactions) and [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#likelihood-ratio-test) 4. Contrast should be set based on your metadata file header and available categories in a form of `Factor Numerator Denominator`, where `Factor` - column name from metadata file, `Numerator` - category from metadata file to be used as numerator in fold change calculation, `Denominator` - category from metadata file to be used as denominator in fold change calculation. For example `condition WT KO`.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq-lrt.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 46a077b51619c6a14f85e0aa5260ae8a04426fab

This ChIP-Seq pipeline is based on the original [BioWardrobe's](https://biowardrobe.com) [PubMed ID:26248465](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248465) **ChIP-Seq** basic analysis workflow for a **paired-end** experiment with Trim Galore. ### Data Analysis SciDAP starts from the .fastq files which most DNA cores and commercial NGS companies return. Starting from raw data allows us to ensure that all experiments have been processed in the same way and simplifies the deposition of data to GEO upon publication. The data can be uploaded from users computer, downloaded directly from an ftp server of the core facility by providing a URL or from GEO by providing SRA accession number. Our current pipelines include the following steps: 1. Trimming the adapters with TrimGalore. This step is particularly important when the reads are long and the fragments are short-resulting in sequencing adapters at the end of read. If adapter is not removed the read will not map. TrimGalore can recognize standard adapters, such as Illumina or Nexterra/Tn5 adapters. 2. QC 3. (Optional) trimming adapters on 5' or 3' end by the specified number of bases. 4. Mapping reads with BowTie. Only uniquely mapped reads with less than 3 mismatches are used in the downstream analysis. Results are saved as a .bam file. 5. (Optional) Removal of duplicates (reads/pairs of reads mapping to exactly same location). This step is used to remove reads overamplified in PCR. Unfortunately, it may also remove \"good\" reads. We usually do not remove duplicates unless the library is heavily duplicated. Please note that MACS2 will remove 'excessive' duplicates during peak calling ina smart way (those not supported by other nearby reads). 6. Peakcalling by MACS2. (Optionally), it is possible to specify read extension length for MACS2 to use if the length determined automatically is wrong. 7. Generation of BigWig coverage files for display on the browser. The coverage shows the number of fragments at each base in the genome normalized to the number of millions of mapped reads. In the case of PE sequencing the fragments are real, but in the case of single reads the fragments are estimated by extending reads to the average fragment length found by MACS2 or specified by the user in 6. ### Details _Trim Galore_ is a wrapper around [Cutadapt](https://github.com/marcelm/cutadapt) and [FastQC](http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) to consistently apply adapter and quality trimming to FastQ files, with extra functionality for RRBS data. A [FASTQ](http://maq.sourceforge.net/fastq.shtml) input file has to be provided. In outputs it returns coordinate sorted BAM file alongside with index BAI file, quality statistics for both the input FASTQ files, reads coverage in a form of BigWig file, peaks calling data in a form of narrowPeak or broadPeak files, islands with the assigned nearest genes and region type, data for average tag density plot (on the base of BAM file). Workflow starts with running fastx_quality_stats (steps fastx_quality_stats_upstream and fastx_quality_stats_downstream) from FASTX-Toolkit to calculate quality statistics for both upstream and downstream input FASTQ files. At the same time Bowtie is used to align reads from input FASTQ files to reference genome (Step bowtie_aligner). The output of this step is unsorted SAM file which is being sorted and indexed by samtools sort and samtools index (Step samtools_sort_index). Depending on workflow’s input parameters indexed and sorted BAM file could be processed by samtools rmdup (Step samtools_rmdup) to remove all possible read duplicates. In a case when removing duplicates is not necessary the step returns original input BAM and BAI files without any processing. If the duplicates were removed the following step (Step samtools_sort_index_after_rmdup) reruns samtools sort and samtools index with BAM and BAI files, if not - the step returns original unchanged input files. Right after that macs2 callpeak performs peak calling (Step macs2_callpeak). On the base of returned outputs the next step (Step macs2_island_count) calculates the number of islands and estimated fragment size. If the last one is less that 80 (hardcoded in a workflow) macs2 callpeak is rerun again with forced fixed fragment size value (Step macs2_callpeak_forced). If at the very beginning it was set in workflow input parameters to force run peak calling with fixed fragment size, this step is skipped and the original peak calling results are saved. In the next step workflow again calculates the number of islands and estimated fragment size (Step macs2_island_count_forced) for the data obtained from macs2_callpeak_forced step. If the last one was skipped the results from macs2_island_count_forced step are equal to the ones obtained from macs2_island_count step. Next step (Step macs2_stat) is used to define which of the islands and estimated fragment size should be used in workflow output: either from macs2_island_count step or from macs2_island_count_forced step. If input trigger of this step is set to True it means that macs2_callpeak_forced step was run and it returned different from macs2_callpeak step results, so macs2_stat step should return [fragments_new, fragments_old, islands_new], if trigger is False the step returns [fragments_old, fragments_old, islands_old], where sufix \"old\" defines results obtained from macs2_island_count step and sufix \"new\" - from macs2_island_count_forced step. The following two steps (Step bamtools_stats and bam_to_bigwig) are used to calculate coverage on the base of input BAM file and save it in BigWig format. For that purpose bamtools stats returns the number of mapped reads number which is then used as scaling factor by bedtools genomecov when it performs coverage calculation and saves it in BED format. The last one is then being sorted and converted to BigWig format by bedGraphToBigWig tool from UCSC utilities. Step get_stat is used to return a text file with statistics in a form of [TOTAL, ALIGNED, SUPRESSED, USED] reads count. Step island_intersect assigns genes and regions to the islands obtained from macs2_callpeak_forced. Step average_tag_density is used to calculate data for average tag density plot on the base of BAM file.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/trim-chipseq-pe.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 2c486543c335bb99b245dfe7e2f033f535efb9cf

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: tests/wf/default-wf5.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 981c03099f79b5aad74555787d406f695dd0b320

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_align_sort_sa.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 803f6367d1b279a7b6dc1a4e8ae43f1bbec9f760

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/count-lines7-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 3e9bca4e006eae7e9febd76eb9b8292702eba2cb

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: tests/wf/scatter-wf4.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 981c03099f79b5aad74555787d406f695dd0b320

Packed ID: main

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_extract_gencoll_ids.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 449f87c8365637e803ba66f83367e96f98c88f5c

GAT: Genomic Association Tester ============================================== A common question in genomic analysis is whether two sets of genomic intervals overlap significantly. This question arises, for example, in the interpretation of ChIP-Seq or RNA-Seq data. The Genomic Association Tester (GAT) is a tool for computing the significance of overlap between multiple sets of genomic intervals. GAT estimates significance based on simulation. Gat implemements a sampling algorithm. Given a chromosome (workspace) and segments of interest, for example from a ChIP-Seq experiment, gat creates randomized version of the segments of interest falling into the workspace. These sampled segments are then compared to existing genomic annotations. The sampling method is conceptually simple. Randomized samples of the segments of interest are created in a two-step procedure. Firstly, a segment size is selected from to same size distribution as the original segments of interest. Secondly, a random position is assigned to the segment. The sampling stops when exactly the same number of nucleotides have been sampled. To improve the speed of sampling, segment overlap is not resolved until the very end of the sampling procedure. Conflicts are then resolved by randomly removing and re-sampling segments until a covering set has been achieved. Because the size of randomized segments is derived from the observed segment size distribution of the segments of interest, the actual segment sizes in the sampled segments are usually not exactly identical to the ones in the segments of interest. This is in contrast to a sampling method that permutes segment positions within the workspace.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/gat-run.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 4ab9399a4777610a579ea2c259b9356f27641dcc