Explore Workflows

Runs DESeq2 using LRT (Likelihood Ratio Test) ============================================= The LRT examines two models for the counts, a full model with a certain number of terms and a reduced model, in which some of the terms of the full model are removed. The test determines if the increased likelihood of the data using the extra terms in the full model is more than expected if those extra terms are truly zero. The LRT is therefore useful for testing multiple terms at once, for example testing 3 or more levels of a factor at once, or all interactions between two variables. The LRT for count data is conceptually similar to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculation in linear regression, except that in the case of the Negative Binomial GLM, we use an analysis of deviance (ANODEV), where the deviance captures the difference in likelihood between a full and a reduced model. When one performs a likelihood ratio test, the p values and the test statistic (the stat column) are values for the test that removes all of the variables which are present in the full design and not in the reduced design. This tests the null hypothesis that all the coefficients from these variables and levels of these factors are equal to zero. The likelihood ratio test p values therefore represent a test of all the variables and all the levels of factors which are among these variables. However, the results table only has space for one column of log fold change, so a single variable and a single comparison is shown (among the potentially multiple log fold changes which were tested in the likelihood ratio test). This indicates that the p value is for the likelihood ratio test of all the variables and all the levels, while the log fold change is a single comparison from among those variables and levels. **Technical notes** 1. At least two biological replicates are required for every compared category 2. Metadata file describes relations between compared experiments, for example ``` ,time,condition DH1,day5,WT DH2,day5,KO DH3,day7,WT DH4,day7,KO DH5,day7,KO ``` where `time, condition, day5, day7, WT, KO` should be a single words (without spaces) and `DH1, DH2, DH3, DH4, DH5` correspond to the experiment aliases set in **RNA-Seq experiments** input. 3. Design and reduced formulas should start with **~** and include categories or, optionally, their interactions from the metadata file header. See details in DESeq2 manual [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#interactions) and [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#likelihood-ratio-test) 4. Contrast should be set based on your metadata file header and available categories in a form of `Factor Numerator Denominator`, where `Factor` - column name from metadata file, `Numerator` - category from metadata file to be used as numerator in fold change calculation, `Denominator` - category from metadata file to be used as denominator in fold change calculation. For example `condition WT KO`.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq-lrt.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 4a5c59829ff8b9f3c843e66e3c675dcd9c689ed5

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: tests/wf/mut3.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 7dec97bb8f0bc2d9e9eb710faf41f2e98cc7cdda

GAT: Genomic Association Tester ============================================== A common question in genomic analysis is whether two sets of genomic intervals overlap significantly. This question arises, for example, in the interpretation of ChIP-Seq or RNA-Seq data. The Genomic Association Tester (GAT) is a tool for computing the significance of overlap between multiple sets of genomic intervals. GAT estimates significance based on simulation. Gat implemements a sampling algorithm. Given a chromosome (workspace) and segments of interest, for example from a ChIP-Seq experiment, gat creates randomized version of the segments of interest falling into the workspace. These sampled segments are then compared to existing genomic annotations. The sampling method is conceptually simple. Randomized samples of the segments of interest are created in a two-step procedure. Firstly, a segment size is selected from to same size distribution as the original segments of interest. Secondly, a random position is assigned to the segment. The sampling stops when exactly the same number of nucleotides have been sampled. To improve the speed of sampling, segment overlap is not resolved until the very end of the sampling procedure. Conflicts are then resolved by randomly removing and re-sampling segments until a covering set has been achieved. Because the size of randomized segments is derived from the observed segment size distribution of the segments of interest, the actual segment sizes in the sampled segments are usually not exactly identical to the ones in the segments of interest. This is in contrast to a sampling method that permutes segment positions within the workspace.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/gat-run.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 1131f82a53315cca217a6c84b3bd272aa62e4bca

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_ani_top_n.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 449f87c8365637e803ba66f83367e96f98c88f5c

Note: should be updated The original [BioWardrobe's](https://biowardrobe.com) [PubMed ID:26248465](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248465) **RNA-Seq** basic analysis for a **single-end** experiment. A corresponded input [FASTQ](http://maq.sourceforge.net/fastq.shtml) file has to be provided. Current workflow should be used only with the single-end RNA-Seq data. It performs the following steps: 1. Trim adapters from input FASTQ file 2. Use STAR to align reads from input FASTQ file according to the predefined reference indices; generate unsorted BAM file and alignment statistics file 3. Use fastx_quality_stats to analyze input FASTQ file and generate quality statistics file 4. Use samtools sort to generate coordinate sorted BAM(+BAI) file pair from the unsorted BAM file obtained on the step 1 (after running STAR) 5. Generate BigWig file on the base of sorted BAM file 6. Map input FASTQ file to predefined rRNA reference indices using Bowtie to define the level of rRNA contamination; export resulted statistics to file 7. Calculate isoform expression level for the sorted BAM file and GTF/TAB annotation file using GEEP reads-counting utility; export results to file

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/trim-rnaseq-se-dutp.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: d1bef74924efcb8bfaa00987b3f148d5a192b7a9

https://github.com/mskcc/Innovation-Pipeline.git

Path: workflows/QC/qc_workflow.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 9e6eae9eb8448e68d509397a46303551a93a164d

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_kmer_cache_retrieve.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 1bf7dc7b03ea3c64e54375cc5c3767849a801000

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_kmer_ref_compare_wnode.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: bba6c580ab88e077f6aa2c2ee7c73159f3f9156e

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/scatter-wf1.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 9e7c68c0834645ba53a7e2b5f70d53df9d051c92

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/subworkflows/bgzip_and_index.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: a7838a5ca72b25db5c2af20a15f34303a839980e