Explore Workflows

View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own

Graph Name Retrieved From View
workflow graph output-arrays-file-wf.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.1.git

Path: tests/output-arrays-file-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: b1d4a69df86350059bd49aa127c02be0c349f7de

workflow graph count-lines10-wf.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.1.git

Path: tests/count-lines10-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: b1d4a69df86350059bd49aa127c02be0c349f7de

workflow graph tt_kmer_top_n.cwl

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_kmer_top_n.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 2c7879b47890b9300ab9b5ebd35e17372e077757

workflow graph tt_blastn_wnode

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_blastn_wnode.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 2c7879b47890b9300ab9b5ebd35e17372e077757

workflow graph dynresreq-workflow-tooldefault.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.1.git

Path: tests/dynresreq-workflow-tooldefault.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: b1d4a69df86350059bd49aa127c02be0c349f7de

workflow graph allele-process-reference.cwl

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: subworkflows/allele-process-reference.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: a7b031090f49ab52195a561c162b326998028a35

workflow graph EMG assembly for paired end Illumina

https://github.com/ProteinsWebTeam/ebi-metagenomics-cwl.git

Path: workflows/emg-assembly.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 135976dc51f067b76db0a923a832d892ed64264c

workflow graph align_sort_sa

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_align_sort_sa.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 23f0ee7a36649ab37cabdd9277b7c82d098be79c

workflow graph DESeq2 (LRT) - differential gene expression analysis using likelihood ratio test

Runs DESeq2 using LRT (Likelihood Ratio Test) ============================================= The LRT examines two models for the counts, a full model with a certain number of terms and a reduced model, in which some of the terms of the full model are removed. The test determines if the increased likelihood of the data using the extra terms in the full model is more than expected if those extra terms are truly zero. The LRT is therefore useful for testing multiple terms at once, for example testing 3 or more levels of a factor at once, or all interactions between two variables. The LRT for count data is conceptually similar to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculation in linear regression, except that in the case of the Negative Binomial GLM, we use an analysis of deviance (ANODEV), where the deviance captures the difference in likelihood between a full and a reduced model. When one performs a likelihood ratio test, the p values and the test statistic (the stat column) are values for the test that removes all of the variables which are present in the full design and not in the reduced design. This tests the null hypothesis that all the coefficients from these variables and levels of these factors are equal to zero. The likelihood ratio test p values therefore represent a test of all the variables and all the levels of factors which are among these variables. However, the results table only has space for one column of log fold change, so a single variable and a single comparison is shown (among the potentially multiple log fold changes which were tested in the likelihood ratio test). This indicates that the p value is for the likelihood ratio test of all the variables and all the levels, while the log fold change is a single comparison from among those variables and levels. **Technical notes** 1. At least two biological replicates are required for every compared category 2. Metadata file describes relations between compared experiments, for example ``` ,time,condition DH1,day5,WT DH2,day5,KO DH3,day7,WT DH4,day7,KO DH5,day7,KO ``` where `time, condition, day5, day7, WT, KO` should be a single words (without spaces) and `DH1, DH2, DH3, DH4, DH5` correspond to the experiment aliases set in **RNA-Seq experiments** input. 3. Design and reduced formulas should start with **~** and include categories or, optionally, their interactions from the metadata file header. See details in DESeq2 manual [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#interactions) and [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#likelihood-ratio-test) 4. Contrast should be set based on your metadata file header and available categories in a form of `Factor Numerator Denominator`, where `Factor` - column name from metadata file, `Numerator` - category from metadata file to be used as numerator in fold change calculation, `Denominator` - category from metadata file to be used as denominator in fold change calculation. For example `condition WT KO`.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq-lrt.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 8a92669a566589d80fde9d151054ffc220ed4ddd

workflow graph io-int-optional-wf.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.1.git

Path: tests/io-int-optional-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: b1d4a69df86350059bd49aa127c02be0c349f7de