Explore Workflows

View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own

Graph Name Retrieved From View
workflow graph count-lines12-wf.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/count-lines12-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 6d2998467fada81e5024c1f8594ae167514cb290
workflow graph workflow.cwl

https://github.com/lanl/BEE.git

Path: examples/cat-grep-tar/workflow.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: cd51dc29a5c74773cd82a704e3cf26126ad43138
workflow graph assm_assm_blastn_wnode

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_assm_assm_blastn_wnode.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 49732e54e2fe2eafd2f82df3c482c73e642f6d64
workflow graph timelimit2-wf.cwl

The entire test should take ~24 seconds. Test that the 20 second time limit applies to each step individually (so 1st step has 20 seconds and the 2nd step has 20 seconds). So this 20 second time limit should not cause the workflow to fail. The timing on this test was updated from shorter values to accommodate the startup time of certain container runners, the previous timelimit of 5 seconds was too short, which is why it is now 20 seconds.

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.2.git

Path: tests/timelimit2-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 707ebcd2173889604459c5f4ffb55173c508abb3
workflow graph count-lines10-wf.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.2.git

Path: tests/count-lines10-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 707ebcd2173889604459c5f4ffb55173c508abb3
workflow graph step-valuefrom2-wf.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.2.git

Path: tests/step-valuefrom2-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 707ebcd2173889604459c5f4ffb55173c508abb3
workflow graph cond-wf-012_nojs.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.2.git

Path: tests/conditionals/cond-wf-012_nojs.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 707ebcd2173889604459c5f4ffb55173c508abb3
workflow graph conflict-wf.cwl#collision

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.2.git

Path: tests/conflict-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 707ebcd2173889604459c5f4ffb55173c508abb3

Packed ID: collision
workflow graph SoupX Estimate

SoupX Estimate ==============

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/soupx.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 261c0232a7a40880f2480b811ed2d7e89c463869
workflow graph RNA-Seq pipeline paired-end stranded mitochondrial

Slightly changed original [BioWardrobe's](https://biowardrobe.com) [PubMed ID:26248465](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248465) **RNA-Seq** basic analysis for **strand specific pair-end** experiment. An additional steps were added to map data to mitochondrial chromosome only and then merge the output. Experiment files in [FASTQ](http://maq.sourceforge.net/fastq.shtml) format either compressed or not can be used. Current workflow should be used only with the pair-end strand specific RNA-Seq data. It performs the following steps: 1. `STAR` to align reads from input FASTQ file according to the predefined reference indices; generate unsorted BAM file and alignment statistics file 2. `fastx_quality_stats` to analyze input FASTQ file and generate quality statistics file 3. `samtools sort` to generate coordinate sorted BAM(+BAI) file pair from the unsorted BAM file obtained on the step 1 (after running STAR) 5. Generate BigWig file on the base of sorted BAM file 6. Map input FASTQ file to predefined rRNA reference indices using Bowtie to define the level of rRNA contamination; export resulted statistics to file 7. Calculate isoform expression level for the sorted BAM file and GTF/TAB annotation file using `GEEP` reads-counting utility; export results to file

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/rnaseq-pe-dutp-mitochondrial.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: c602e3cdd72ff904dd54d46ba2b5146eb1c57022