Explore Workflows

https://github.com/mskcc/ACCESS-Pipeline.git

Path: workflows/module-2.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: daba08457dd53fb81d11acb274c29a77b6122316

https://github.com/msk-access/qc_generation.git

Path: aggregate_visualize.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 248e7c3edaff48e1b97a7931d66aa3b23ce97f54

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/alignment_exome_nonhuman.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 97572e3a088d79f6a4166385f79e79ea77b11470

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: progs/gp_makeblastdb.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 656113dcac0de7cef6cff6c688f61441ee05872a

https://github.com/NAL-i5K/Organism_Onboarding.git

Path: flow_create_readme/readme-assembly-workflow.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: f7894707dd30a0edd199d3b67c4c8678f64c90b3

Runs DESeq2 using LRT (Likelihood Ratio Test) ============================================= The LRT examines two models for the counts, a full model with a certain number of terms and a reduced model, in which some of the terms of the full model are removed. The test determines if the increased likelihood of the data using the extra terms in the full model is more than expected if those extra terms are truly zero. The LRT is therefore useful for testing multiple terms at once, for example testing 3 or more levels of a factor at once, or all interactions between two variables. The LRT for count data is conceptually similar to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculation in linear regression, except that in the case of the Negative Binomial GLM, we use an analysis of deviance (ANODEV), where the deviance captures the difference in likelihood between a full and a reduced model. When one performs a likelihood ratio test, the p values and the test statistic (the stat column) are values for the test that removes all of the variables which are present in the full design and not in the reduced design. This tests the null hypothesis that all the coefficients from these variables and levels of these factors are equal to zero. The likelihood ratio test p values therefore represent a test of all the variables and all the levels of factors which are among these variables. However, the results table only has space for one column of log fold change, so a single variable and a single comparison is shown (among the potentially multiple log fold changes which were tested in the likelihood ratio test). This indicates that the p value is for the likelihood ratio test of all the variables and all the levels, while the log fold change is a single comparison from among those variables and levels. **Technical notes** 1. At least two biological replicates are required for every compared category 2. Metadata file describes relations between compared experiments, for example ``` ,time,condition DH1,day5,WT DH2,day5,KO DH3,day7,WT DH4,day7,KO DH5,day7,KO ``` where `time, condition, day5, day7, WT, KO` should be a single words (without spaces) and `DH1, DH2, DH3, DH4, DH5` correspond to the experiment aliases set in **RNA-Seq experiments** input. 3. Design and reduced formulas should start with **~** and include categories or, optionally, their interactions from the metadata file header. See details in DESeq2 manual [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#interactions) and [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#likelihood-ratio-test) 4. Contrast should be set based on your metadata file header and available categories in a form of `Factor Numerator Denominator`, where `Factor` - column name from metadata file, `Numerator` - category from metadata file to be used as numerator in fold change calculation, `Denominator` - category from metadata file to be used as denominator in fold change calculation. For example `condition WT KO`.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq-lrt.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: d1bef74924efcb8bfaa00987b3f148d5a192b7a9

Prepare user input for NCBI-PGAP pipeline

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: prepare_user_input2.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: b38b0070edf910984f29a4a495b5dfa525b8b305

Cross-Linking ImmunoPrecipitation ================================= `CLIP` (`cross-linking immunoprecipitation`) is a method used in molecular biology that combines UV cross-linking with immunoprecipitation in order to analyse protein interactions with RNA or to precisely locate RNA modifications (e.g. m6A). (Uhl|Houwaart|Corrado|Wright|Backofen|2017)(Ule|Jensen|Ruggiu|Mele|2003)(Sugimoto|König|Hussain|Zupan|2012)(Zhang|Darnell|2011) (Ke| Alemu| Mertens| Gantman|2015) CLIP-based techniques can be used to map RNA binding protein binding sites or RNA modification sites (Ke| Alemu| Mertens| Gantman|2015)(Ke| Pandya-Jones| Saito| Fak|2017) of interest on a genome-wide scale, thereby increasing the understanding of post-transcriptional regulatory networks. The identification of sites where RNA-binding proteins (RNABPs) interact with target RNAs opens the door to understanding the vast complexity of RNA regulation. UV cross-linking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) is a transformative technology in which RNAs purified from _in vivo_ cross-linked RNA-protein complexes are sequenced to reveal footprints of RNABP:RNA contacts. CLIP combined with high-throughput sequencing (HITS-CLIP) is a generalizable strategy to produce transcriptome-wide maps of RNA binding with higher accuracy and resolution than standard RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) profiling or purely computational approaches. The application of CLIP to Argonaute proteins has expanded the utility of this approach to mapping binding sites for microRNAs and other small regulatory RNAs. Finally, recent advances in data analysis take advantage of cross-link–induced mutation sites (CIMS) to refine RNA-binding maps to single-nucleotide resolution. Once IP conditions are established, HITS-CLIP takes ~8 d to prepare RNA for sequencing. Established pipelines for data analysis, including those for CIMS, take 3–4 d. Workflow -------- CLIP begins with the in-vivo cross-linking of RNA-protein complexes using ultraviolet light (UV). Upon UV exposure, covalent bonds are formed between proteins and nucleic acids that are in close proximity. (Darnell|2012) The cross-linked cells are then lysed, and the protein of interest is isolated via immunoprecipitation. In order to allow for sequence specific priming of reverse transcription, RNA adapters are ligated to the 3' ends, while radiolabeled phosphates are transferred to the 5' ends of the RNA fragments. The RNA-protein complexes are then separated from free RNA using gel electrophoresis and membrane transfer. Proteinase K digestion is then performed in order to remove protein from the RNA-protein complexes. This step leaves a peptide at the cross-link site, allowing for the identification of the cross-linked nucleotide. (König| McGlincy| Ule|2012) After ligating RNA linkers to the RNA 5' ends, cDNA is synthesized via RT-PCR. High-throughput sequencing is then used to generate reads containing distinct barcodes that identify the last cDNA nucleotide. Interaction sites can be identified by mapping the reads back to the transcriptome.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/clipseq-se.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 1f03ff02ef829bdb9d582825bcd4ca239e84ca2e

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: progs/protein_extract.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 17bae57a1f00f5c6db8f3a82d86262f12b8153cf

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: progs/gp_makeblastdb.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 17bae57a1f00f5c6db8f3a82d86262f12b8153cf