Explore Workflows

View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own

Graph Name Retrieved From View
workflow graph tt_kmer_compare_wnode

Pairwise comparison

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_kmer_compare_wnode.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 1e7aa9f0c34987ddafa35f9b1d2c77d99fafbdab

workflow graph DESeq2 (LRT) - differential gene expression analysis using likelihood ratio test

Runs DESeq2 using LRT (Likelihood Ratio Test) ============================================= The LRT examines two models for the counts, a full model with a certain number of terms and a reduced model, in which some of the terms of the full model are removed. The test determines if the increased likelihood of the data using the extra terms in the full model is more than expected if those extra terms are truly zero. The LRT is therefore useful for testing multiple terms at once, for example testing 3 or more levels of a factor at once, or all interactions between two variables. The LRT for count data is conceptually similar to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculation in linear regression, except that in the case of the Negative Binomial GLM, we use an analysis of deviance (ANODEV), where the deviance captures the difference in likelihood between a full and a reduced model. When one performs a likelihood ratio test, the p values and the test statistic (the stat column) are values for the test that removes all of the variables which are present in the full design and not in the reduced design. This tests the null hypothesis that all the coefficients from these variables and levels of these factors are equal to zero. The likelihood ratio test p values therefore represent a test of all the variables and all the levels of factors which are among these variables. However, the results table only has space for one column of log fold change, so a single variable and a single comparison is shown (among the potentially multiple log fold changes which were tested in the likelihood ratio test). This indicates that the p value is for the likelihood ratio test of all the variables and all the levels, while the log fold change is a single comparison from among those variables and levels. **Technical notes** 1. At least two biological replicates are required for every compared category 2. Metadata file describes relations between compared experiments, for example ``` ,time,condition DH1,day5,WT DH2,day5,KO DH3,day7,WT DH4,day7,KO DH5,day7,KO ``` where `time, condition, day5, day7, WT, KO` should be a single words (without spaces) and `DH1, DH2, DH3, DH4, DH5` correspond to the experiment aliases set in **RNA-Seq experiments** input. 3. Design and reduced formulas should start with **~** and include categories or, optionally, their interactions from the metadata file header. See details in DESeq2 manual [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#interactions) and [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#likelihood-ratio-test) 4. Contrast should be set based on your metadata file header and available categories in a form of `Factor Numerator Denominator`, where `Factor` - column name from metadata file, `Numerator` - category from metadata file to be used as numerator in fold change calculation, `Denominator` - category from metadata file to be used as denominator in fold change calculation. For example `condition WT KO`.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq-lrt.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: e0a30aa1ad516dd2ec0e9ce006428964b840daf4

workflow graph m2a.cwl

https://github.com/chenlab-sj/M2A.git

Path: cwl/m2a.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: a5f8205d2cd4479721289902fb7e6f0dc0cc6029

workflow graph pipeline.cwl

https://github.com/hubmapconsortium/spatial-transcriptomics-pipeline.git

Path: pipeline.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 03b8da4ede3afcbf97b4e780c153155f33e76c84

workflow graph abra_workflow.cwl

https://github.com/mskcc/ACCESS-Pipeline.git

Path: workflows/ABRA/abra_workflow.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: fcee00917fe332edfe426f7972c7ab37de75b9f3

workflow graph alignment_workflow_md5checker.cwl

https://github.com/databiosphere/topmed-workflows.git

Path: aligner/topmed-cwl/workflow/alignment_workflow_md5checker.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 6478d5df50d7340311d18f03a056e3db97811269

workflow graph Cell Ranger ARC Count Gene Expression + ATAC

Cell Ranger ARC Count Gene Expression + ATAC ============================================

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/cellranger-arc-count.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: b14e361e7b99b7233facfb9f68ac9b22406d74ee

workflow graph heatmap-prepare.cwl

Workflow runs homer-make-tag-directory.cwl tool using scatter for the following inputs - bam_file - fragment_size - total_reads `dotproduct` is used as a `scatterMethod`, so one element will be taken from each array to construct each job: 1) bam_file[0] fragment_size[0] total_reads[0] 2) bam_file[1] fragment_size[1] total_reads[1] ... N) bam_file[N] fragment_size[N] total_reads[N] `bam_file`, `fragment_size` and `total_reads` arrays should have the identical order.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: tools/heatmap-prepare.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 77970404d7c704cba965ae646582e19e5d76aabe

workflow graph allele-process-reference.cwl

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: subworkflows/allele-process-reference.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 94471ee6c01b7bc17102e45e56e7366c2a52acdf

workflow graph allele-process-strain.cwl

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: subworkflows/allele-process-strain.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 94471ee6c01b7bc17102e45e56e7366c2a52acdf