Explore Workflows

View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own

Graph Name Retrieved From View
workflow graph SoupX - an R package for the estimation and removal of cell free mRNA contamination

Devel version of Single-Cell Advanced Cell Ranger Pipeline (SoupX) =================================================================

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/soupx.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 4ab9399a4777610a579ea2c259b9356f27641dcc

workflow graph kmer_seq_entry_extract_wnode

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_kmer_seq_entry_extract_wnode.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 17bae57a1f00f5c6db8f3a82d86262f12b8153cf

workflow graph basename-fields-test.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/basename-fields-test.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 047e69bb169e79fad6a7285ee798c4ecec3b218b

workflow graph DESeq2 (LRT) - differential gene expression analysis using likelihood ratio test

Runs DESeq2 using LRT (Likelihood Ratio Test) ============================================= The LRT examines two models for the counts, a full model with a certain number of terms and a reduced model, in which some of the terms of the full model are removed. The test determines if the increased likelihood of the data using the extra terms in the full model is more than expected if those extra terms are truly zero. The LRT is therefore useful for testing multiple terms at once, for example testing 3 or more levels of a factor at once, or all interactions between two variables. The LRT for count data is conceptually similar to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculation in linear regression, except that in the case of the Negative Binomial GLM, we use an analysis of deviance (ANODEV), where the deviance captures the difference in likelihood between a full and a reduced model. When one performs a likelihood ratio test, the p values and the test statistic (the stat column) are values for the test that removes all of the variables which are present in the full design and not in the reduced design. This tests the null hypothesis that all the coefficients from these variables and levels of these factors are equal to zero. The likelihood ratio test p values therefore represent a test of all the variables and all the levels of factors which are among these variables. However, the results table only has space for one column of log fold change, so a single variable and a single comparison is shown (among the potentially multiple log fold changes which were tested in the likelihood ratio test). This indicates that the p value is for the likelihood ratio test of all the variables and all the levels, while the log fold change is a single comparison from among those variables and levels. **Technical notes** 1. At least two biological replicates are required for every compared category 2. Metadata file describes relations between compared experiments, for example ``` ,time,condition DH1,day5,WT DH2,day5,KO DH3,day7,WT DH4,day7,KO DH5,day7,KO ``` where `time, condition, day5, day7, WT, KO` should be a single words (without spaces) and `DH1, DH2, DH3, DH4, DH5` correspond to the experiment aliases set in **RNA-Seq experiments** input. 3. Design and reduced formulas should start with **~** and include categories or, optionally, their interactions from the metadata file header. See details in DESeq2 manual [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#interactions) and [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#likelihood-ratio-test) 4. Contrast should be set based on your metadata file header and available categories in a form of `Factor Numerator Denominator`, where `Factor` - column name from metadata file, `Numerator` - category from metadata file to be used as numerator in fold change calculation, `Denominator` - category from metadata file to be used as denominator in fold change calculation. For example `condition WT KO`.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq-lrt.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 4360fb2e778ecee42e5f78f83b78c65ab3a2b1df

workflow graph Trim Galore ChIP-Seq pipeline single-read

The original [BioWardrobe's](https://biowardrobe.com) [PubMed ID:26248465](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248465) **ChIP-Seq** basic analysis workflow for a **single-read** experiment with Trim Galore. _Trim Galore_ is a wrapper around [Cutadapt](https://github.com/marcelm/cutadapt) and [FastQC](http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) to consistently apply adapter and quality trimming to FastQ files, with extra functionality for RRBS data. In outputs it returns coordinate sorted BAM file alongside with index BAI file, quality statistics of the input FASTQ file, reads coverage in a form of BigWig file, peaks calling data in a form of narrowPeak or broadPeak files, islands with the assigned nearest genes and region type, data for average tag density plot (on the base of BAM file). Workflow starts with step *fastx\_quality\_stats* from FASTX-Toolkit to calculate quality statistics for input FASTQ file. At the same time `bowtie` is used to align reads from input FASTQ file to reference genome *bowtie\_aligner*. The output of this step is unsorted SAM file which is being sorted and indexed by `samtools sort` and `samtools index` *samtools\_sort\_index*. Based on workflow’s input parameters indexed and sorted BAM file can be processed by `samtools rmdup` *samtools\_rmdup* to get rid of duplicated reads. If removing duplicates is not required the original input BAM and BAI files return. Otherwise step *samtools\_sort\_index\_after\_rmdup* repeat `samtools sort` and `samtools index` with BAM and BAI files. Right after that `macs2 callpeak` performs peak calling *macs2\_callpeak*. On the base of returned outputs the next step *macs2\_island\_count* calculates the number of islands and estimated fragment size. If the last one is less that 80bp (hardcoded in the workflow) `macs2 callpeak` is rerun again with forced fixed fragment size value (*macs2\_callpeak\_forced*). If at the very beginning it was set in workflow input parameters to force run peak calling with fixed fragment size, this step is skipped and the original peak calling results are saved. In the next step workflow again calculates the number of islands and estimates fragment size (*macs2\_island\_count\_forced*) for the data obtained from *macs2\_callpeak\_forced* step. If the last one was skipped the results from *macs2\_island\_count\_forced* step are equal to the ones obtained from *macs2\_island\_count* step. Next step (*macs2\_stat*) is used to define which of the islands and estimated fragment size should be used in workflow output: either from *macs2\_island\_count* step or from *macs2\_island\_count\_forced* step. If input trigger of this step is set to True it means that *macs2\_callpeak\_forced* step was run and it returned different from *macs2\_callpeak* step results, so *macs2\_stat* step should return [fragments\_new, fragments\_old, islands\_new], if trigger is False the step returns [fragments\_old, fragments\_old, islands\_old], where sufix \"old\" defines results obtained from *macs2\_island\_count* step and sufix \"new\" - from *macs2\_island\_count\_forced* step. The following two steps (*bamtools\_stats* and *bam\_to\_bigwig*) are used to calculate coverage on the base of input BAM file and save it in BigWig format. For that purpose bamtools stats returns the number of mapped reads number which is then used as scaling factor by bedtools genomecov when it performs coverage calculation and saves it in BED format. The last one is then being sorted and converted to BigWig format by bedGraphToBigWig tool from UCSC utilities. Step *get\_stat* is used to return a text file with statistics in a form of [TOTAL, ALIGNED, SUPRESSED, USED] reads count. Step *island\_intersect* assigns genes and regions to the islands obtained from *macs2\_callpeak\_forced*. Step *average\_tag\_density* is used to calculate data for average tag density plot on the base of BAM file.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/trim-chipseq-se.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 44214a9d02e6d85b03eb708552ed812ae3d4a733

workflow graph tt_kmer_compare_wnode

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_kmer_compare_wnode.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 803f6367d1b279a7b6dc1a4e8ae43f1bbec9f760

workflow graph gcaccess_from_list

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_gcaccess_from_list.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 146df33e2e44afa2a608ac72c036e6b6b871af93

workflow graph rnaseq-star-rsem-pe.cwl

https://github.com/pitagora-network/dat2-cwl.git

Path: workflow/rna-seq/rnaseq-star-rsem-pe/rnaseq-star-rsem-pe.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 6db4456ca7314b036e59f50910654066da99772a

workflow graph Build STAR indices

Workflow runs [STAR](https://github.com/alexdobin/STAR) v2.5.3a (03/17/2017) PMID: [23104886](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23104886) to build indices for reference genome provided in a single FASTA file as fasta_file input and GTF annotation file from annotation_gtf_file input. Generated indices are saved in a folder with the name that corresponds to the input genome.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/star-index.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 44214a9d02e6d85b03eb708552ed812ae3d4a733

workflow graph Motif Finding with HOMER with target and background regions from peaks

Motif Finding with HOMER with target and background regions from peaks --------------------------------------------------- HOMER contains a novel motif discovery algorithm that was designed for regulatory element analysis in genomics applications (DNA only, no protein). It is a differential motif discovery algorithm, which means that it takes two sets of sequences and tries to identify the regulatory elements that are specifically enriched in on set relative to the other. It uses ZOOPS scoring (zero or one occurrence per sequence) coupled with the hypergeometric enrichment calculations (or binomial) to determine motif enrichment. HOMER also tries its best to account for sequenced bias in the dataset. It was designed with ChIP-Seq and promoter analysis in mind, but can be applied to pretty much any nucleic acids motif finding problem. For more information please refer to: ------------------------------------- [Official documentation](http://homer.ucsd.edu/homer/motif/)

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/homer-motif-analysis-peak.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 36fd18f11e939d3908b1eca8d2939402f7a99b0f