Explore Workflows

View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own

Graph Name Retrieved From View
workflow graph Trim Galore ChIP-Seq pipeline paired-end

This ChIP-Seq pipeline is based on the original [BioWardrobe's](https://biowardrobe.com) [PubMed ID:26248465](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248465) **ChIP-Seq** basic analysis workflow for a **paired-end** experiment with Trim Galore. ### Data Analysis SciDAP starts from the .fastq files which most DNA cores and commercial NGS companies return. Starting from raw data allows us to ensure that all experiments have been processed in the same way and simplifies the deposition of data to GEO upon publication. The data can be uploaded from users computer, downloaded directly from an ftp server of the core facility by providing a URL or from GEO by providing SRA accession number. Our current pipelines include the following steps: 1. Trimming the adapters with TrimGalore. This step is particularly important when the reads are long and the fragments are short-resulting in sequencing adapters at the end of read. If adapter is not removed the read will not map. TrimGalore can recognize standard adapters, such as Illumina or Nexterra/Tn5 adapters. 2. QC 3. (Optional) trimming adapters on 5' or 3' end by the specified number of bases. 4. Mapping reads with BowTie. Only uniquely mapped reads with less than 3 mismatches are used in the downstream analysis. Results are saved as a .bam file. 5. (Optional) Removal of duplicates (reads/pairs of reads mapping to exactly same location). This step is used to remove reads overamplified in PCR. Unfortunately, it may also remove \"good\" reads. We usually do not remove duplicates unless the library is heavily duplicated. Please note that MACS2 will remove 'excessive' duplicates during peak calling ina smart way (those not supported by other nearby reads). 6. Peakcalling by MACS2. (Optionally), it is possible to specify read extension length for MACS2 to use if the length determined automatically is wrong. 7. Generation of BigWig coverage files for display on the browser. The coverage shows the number of fragments at each base in the genome normalized to the number of millions of mapped reads. In the case of PE sequencing the fragments are real, but in the case of single reads the fragments are estimated by extending reads to the average fragment length found by MACS2 or specified by the user in 6. ### Details _Trim Galore_ is a wrapper around [Cutadapt](https://github.com/marcelm/cutadapt) and [FastQC](http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/) to consistently apply adapter and quality trimming to FastQ files, with extra functionality for RRBS data. A [FASTQ](http://maq.sourceforge.net/fastq.shtml) input file has to be provided. In outputs it returns coordinate sorted BAM file alongside with index BAI file, quality statistics for both the input FASTQ files, reads coverage in a form of BigWig file, peaks calling data in a form of narrowPeak or broadPeak files, islands with the assigned nearest genes and region type, data for average tag density plot (on the base of BAM file). Workflow starts with running fastx_quality_stats (steps fastx_quality_stats_upstream and fastx_quality_stats_downstream) from FASTX-Toolkit to calculate quality statistics for both upstream and downstream input FASTQ files. At the same time Bowtie is used to align reads from input FASTQ files to reference genome (Step bowtie_aligner). The output of this step is unsorted SAM file which is being sorted and indexed by samtools sort and samtools index (Step samtools_sort_index). Depending on workflow’s input parameters indexed and sorted BAM file could be processed by samtools rmdup (Step samtools_rmdup) to remove all possible read duplicates. In a case when removing duplicates is not necessary the step returns original input BAM and BAI files without any processing. If the duplicates were removed the following step (Step samtools_sort_index_after_rmdup) reruns samtools sort and samtools index with BAM and BAI files, if not - the step returns original unchanged input files. Right after that macs2 callpeak performs peak calling (Step macs2_callpeak). On the base of returned outputs the next step (Step macs2_island_count) calculates the number of islands and estimated fragment size. If the last one is less that 80 (hardcoded in a workflow) macs2 callpeak is rerun again with forced fixed fragment size value (Step macs2_callpeak_forced). If at the very beginning it was set in workflow input parameters to force run peak calling with fixed fragment size, this step is skipped and the original peak calling results are saved. In the next step workflow again calculates the number of islands and estimated fragment size (Step macs2_island_count_forced) for the data obtained from macs2_callpeak_forced step. If the last one was skipped the results from macs2_island_count_forced step are equal to the ones obtained from macs2_island_count step. Next step (Step macs2_stat) is used to define which of the islands and estimated fragment size should be used in workflow output: either from macs2_island_count step or from macs2_island_count_forced step. If input trigger of this step is set to True it means that macs2_callpeak_forced step was run and it returned different from macs2_callpeak step results, so macs2_stat step should return [fragments_new, fragments_old, islands_new], if trigger is False the step returns [fragments_old, fragments_old, islands_old], where sufix \"old\" defines results obtained from macs2_island_count step and sufix \"new\" - from macs2_island_count_forced step. The following two steps (Step bamtools_stats and bam_to_bigwig) are used to calculate coverage on the base of input BAM file and save it in BigWig format. For that purpose bamtools stats returns the number of mapped reads number which is then used as scaling factor by bedtools genomecov when it performs coverage calculation and saves it in BED format. The last one is then being sorted and converted to BigWig format by bedGraphToBigWig tool from UCSC utilities. Step get_stat is used to return a text file with statistics in a form of [TOTAL, ALIGNED, SUPRESSED, USED] reads count. Step island_intersect assigns genes and regions to the islands obtained from macs2_callpeak_forced. Step average_tag_density is used to calculate data for average tag density plot on the base of BAM file.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/trim-chipseq-pe.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 36fd18f11e939d3908b1eca8d2939402f7a99b0f

workflow graph WGS QC workflow

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/subworkflows/qc_wgs.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 60edaf6f57eaaf02cda1a3d8cb9a825aa64a43e2

workflow graph CLIP-Seq pipeline for single-read experiment NNNNG

Cross-Linking ImmunoPrecipitation ================================= `CLIP` (`cross-linking immunoprecipitation`) is a method used in molecular biology that combines UV cross-linking with immunoprecipitation in order to analyse protein interactions with RNA or to precisely locate RNA modifications (e.g. m6A). (Uhl|Houwaart|Corrado|Wright|Backofen|2017)(Ule|Jensen|Ruggiu|Mele|2003)(Sugimoto|König|Hussain|Zupan|2012)(Zhang|Darnell|2011) (Ke| Alemu| Mertens| Gantman|2015) CLIP-based techniques can be used to map RNA binding protein binding sites or RNA modification sites (Ke| Alemu| Mertens| Gantman|2015)(Ke| Pandya-Jones| Saito| Fak|2017) of interest on a genome-wide scale, thereby increasing the understanding of post-transcriptional regulatory networks. The identification of sites where RNA-binding proteins (RNABPs) interact with target RNAs opens the door to understanding the vast complexity of RNA regulation. UV cross-linking and immunoprecipitation (CLIP) is a transformative technology in which RNAs purified from _in vivo_ cross-linked RNA-protein complexes are sequenced to reveal footprints of RNABP:RNA contacts. CLIP combined with high-throughput sequencing (HITS-CLIP) is a generalizable strategy to produce transcriptome-wide maps of RNA binding with higher accuracy and resolution than standard RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) profiling or purely computational approaches. The application of CLIP to Argonaute proteins has expanded the utility of this approach to mapping binding sites for microRNAs and other small regulatory RNAs. Finally, recent advances in data analysis take advantage of cross-link–induced mutation sites (CIMS) to refine RNA-binding maps to single-nucleotide resolution. Once IP conditions are established, HITS-CLIP takes ~8 d to prepare RNA for sequencing. Established pipelines for data analysis, including those for CIMS, take 3–4 d. Workflow -------- CLIP begins with the in-vivo cross-linking of RNA-protein complexes using ultraviolet light (UV). Upon UV exposure, covalent bonds are formed between proteins and nucleic acids that are in close proximity. (Darnell|2012) The cross-linked cells are then lysed, and the protein of interest is isolated via immunoprecipitation. In order to allow for sequence specific priming of reverse transcription, RNA adapters are ligated to the 3' ends, while radiolabeled phosphates are transferred to the 5' ends of the RNA fragments. The RNA-protein complexes are then separated from free RNA using gel electrophoresis and membrane transfer. Proteinase K digestion is then performed in order to remove protein from the RNA-protein complexes. This step leaves a peptide at the cross-link site, allowing for the identification of the cross-linked nucleotide. (König| McGlincy| Ule|2012) After ligating RNA linkers to the RNA 5' ends, cDNA is synthesized via RT-PCR. High-throughput sequencing is then used to generate reads containing distinct barcodes that identify the last cDNA nucleotide. Interaction sites can be identified by mapping the reads back to the transcriptome.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/clipseq-se.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: dda9e6e06a656b7b3fa7504156474b962fe3953c

workflow graph umi per-lane alignment subworkflow

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/subworkflows/umi_alignment.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 60edaf6f57eaaf02cda1a3d8cb9a825aa64a43e2

workflow graph kmer_compare_wnode

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_kmer_compare_wnode.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 6d8d29a2156b93a75f1d1c6952738bd63f6bd98e

workflow graph exome alignment with qc, no bqsr, no verify_bam_id

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/alignment_exome_mouse.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: adcae308fdccaa1190083616118dfadb4df65dca

workflow graph default-wf5.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: tests/wf/default-wf5.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: b82ce7ae901a54c7a062fd5eefd8d5ceb5a4d684

workflow graph bam_readcount workflow

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/subworkflows/bam_readcount.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 049f4aeff4c4a1b8421cac9b1c1c1f0da5848315

workflow graph count-lines13-wf.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/count-lines13-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 6003cbb94f16103241b562f2133e7c4acac6c621

workflow graph wgs alignment and germline variant detection

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/germline_wgs.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 4bc0a4577d626b65a4b44683e5a1ab2f7d7faf4c