Explore Workflows

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/count-lines4-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 09323506da219ba3ddb5313bd83022b52cac9adc

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/germline_exome_gvcf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 35e6b3ef71b4a2a9caba1dbd5dc424a8809bcc0a

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: tests/wf/scatter-wf4.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: d5f7fa162611243f0c66dd3e933c16a4964a09ca

Packed ID: main

GSEAPY: Gene Set Enrichment Analysis in Python ============================================== Gene Set Enrichment Analysis is a computational method that determines whether an a priori defined set of genes shows statistically significant, concordant differences between two biological states (e.g. phenotypes). GSEA requires as input an expression dataset, which contains expression profiles for multiple samples. While the software supports multiple input file formats for these datasets, the tab-delimited GCT format is the most common. The first column of the GCT file contains feature identifiers (gene ids or symbols in the case of data derived from RNA-Seq experiments). The second column contains a description of the feature; this column is ignored by GSEA and may be filled with “NA”s. Subsequent columns contain the expression values for each feature, with one sample's expression value per column. It is important to note that there are no hard and fast rules regarding how a GCT file's expression values are derived. The important point is that they are comparable to one another across features within a sample and comparable to one another across samples. Tools such as DESeq2 can be made to produce properly normalized data (normalized counts) which are compatible with GSEA. Documents ============================================== - GSEA Home Page: https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/index.jsp - Results Interpretation: https://www.gsea-msigdb.org/gsea/doc/GSEAUserGuideTEXT.htm#_Interpreting_GSEA_Results - GSEA User Guide: https://gseapy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/faq.html - GSEAPY Docs: https://gseapy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/introduction.html References ============================================== - Subramanian, Tamayo, et al. (2005, PNAS), https://www.pnas.org/content/102/43/15545 - Mootha, Lindgren, et al. (2003, Nature Genetics), http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v34/n3/abs/ng1180.html

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/gseapy.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 36fd18f11e939d3908b1eca8d2939402f7a99b0f

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/sum-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 047e69bb169e79fad6a7285ee798c4ecec3b218b

https://github.com/d3b-center/canine-dev.git

Path: subworkflows/canine_bcftools_annotate_module.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 462aaebbd442e84ea101b45b716df0174b88512e

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/panel_of_normals.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 038cb3617a1966a1057386adcde97ce55d9e1139

What is MAnorm? -------------- MAnorm is a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets of TFs (transcription factors) or epigenetic modifications and you can use it for: * Normalization of two ChIP-seq samples * Quantitative comparison (differential analysis) of two ChIP-seq samples * Evaluating the overlap enrichment of the protein binding sites(peaks) * Elucidating underlying mechanisms of cell-type specific gene regulation How MAnorm works? ---------------- MAnorm uses common peaks of two samples as a reference to build the rescaling model for normalization, which is based on the empirical assumption that if a chromatin-associated protein has a substantial number of peaks shared in two conditions, the binding at these common regions will tend to be determined by similar mechanisms, and thus should exhibit similar global binding intensities across samples. The observed differences on common peaks are presumed to reflect the scaling relationship of ChIP-Seq signals between two samples, which can be applied to all peaks. What do the inputs mean? ---------------- ### General **Experiment short name/Alias** * short name for you experiment to identify among the others **ChIP-Seq PE sample 1** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq paired-end experiment to be used as Sample 1 **ChIP-Seq PE sample 2** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq paired-end experiment to be used as Sample 2 **Genome** * Reference genome to be used for gene assigning ### Advanced **Reads shift size for sample 1** * This value is used to shift reads towards 3' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **Reads shift size for sample 2** * This value is used to shift reads towards 5' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff** * Absolute M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff to define biased (differential binding) peaks. Default: 1.0 **P-value cutoff** * P-value cutoff to define biased peaks. Default: 0.01 **Window size** * Window size to count reads and calculate read densities. 2000 is recommended for sharp histone marks like H3K4me3 and H3K27ac, and 1000 for TFs or DNase-seq. Default: 2000

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/manorm-pe.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: dda9e6e06a656b7b3fa7504156474b962fe3953c

Motif Finding with HOMER with target and background regions from peaks --------------------------------------------------- HOMER contains a novel motif discovery algorithm that was designed for regulatory element analysis in genomics applications (DNA only, no protein). It is a differential motif discovery algorithm, which means that it takes two sets of sequences and tries to identify the regulatory elements that are specifically enriched in on set relative to the other. It uses ZOOPS scoring (zero or one occurrence per sequence) coupled with the hypergeometric enrichment calculations (or binomial) to determine motif enrichment. HOMER also tries its best to account for sequenced bias in the dataset. It was designed with ChIP-Seq and promoter analysis in mind, but can be applied to pretty much any nucleic acids motif finding problem. For more information please refer to: ------------------------------------- [Official documentation](http://homer.ucsd.edu/homer/motif/)

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/homer-motif-analysis-peak.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: f3e44d3b0f198cf5245c49011124dc3b6c2b06fd

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/chipseq.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: adcae308fdccaa1190083616118dfadb4df65dca