Explore Workflows

View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own

Graph Name Retrieved From View
workflow graph directory.cwl

Inspect provided directory and return filenames. Generate a new directory and return it (including content).

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: tests/wf/directory.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: bbe20f54deea92d9c9cd38cb1f23c4423133d3de

workflow graph DESeq - differential gene expression analysis

# Differential gene expression analysis This differential gene expression (DGE) analysis takes as input samples from two experimental conditions that have been processed with an RNA-Seq workflow (see list of \"Upstream workflows\" below). DESeq estimates variance-mean dependence in count data from high-throughput sequencing assays, then tests for DGE based on a model which assumes a negative binomial distribution of gene expression (aligned read count per gene). ### Experimental Setup and Results Interpretation The workflow design uses as its fold change (FC) calculation: condition 1 (c1, e.g. treatment) over condition 2 (c2, e.g. control). In other words: `FC == (c1/c2)` Therefore: - if FC<1 the log2(FC) is <0 (negative), meaning expression in condition1<condition2 (gene is downregulated in c1) - if FC>1 the log2(FC) is >0 (positive), meaning expression in condition1>condition2 (gene is upregulated in c1) In other words, if you have input TREATMENT samples as condition 1, and CONTROL samples as condition 2, a positive L2FC for a gene indicates that expression of the gene in TREATMENT is greater (or upregulated) compared to CONTROL. Next, threshold the p-adjusted values with your FDR (false discovery rate) cutoff to determine if the change may be considered significant or not. It is important to note when DESeq1 or DESeq2 is used in our DGE analysis workflow. If a user inputs only a single sample per condition DESeq1 is used for calculating DGE. In this experimental setup, there are no repeated measurements per gene per condition, therefore biological variability in each condition cannot be captured so the output p-values are assumed to be purely \"technical\". On the other hand, if >1 sample(s) are input per condition DESeq2 is used. In this case, biological variability per gene within each condition is available to be incorporated into the model, and resulting p-values are assumed to be \"biological\". Additionally, DESeq2 fold change is \"shrunk\" to account for sample variability, and as Michael Love (DESeq maintainer) puts it, \"it looks at the largest fold changes that are not due to low counts and uses these to inform a prior distribution. So the large fold changes from genes with lots of statistical information are not shrunk, while the imprecise fold changes are shrunk. This allows you to compare all estimated LFC across experiments, for example, which is not really feasible without the use of a prior\". In either case, the null hypothesis (H0) tested is that there are no significantly differentially expressed genes between conditions, therefore a smaller p-value indicates a lower probability of the H0 occurring by random chance and therefore, below a certain threshold (traditionally <0.05), H0 should be rejected. Additionally, due to the many thousands of independent hypotheses being tested (each gene representing an independent test), the p-values attained by the Wald test are adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg method by default. These \"padj\" values should be used for determination of significance (a reasonable value here would be <0.10, i.e. below a 10% FDR). Further Analysis: Output from the DESeq workflow may be used as input to the GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) workflow for identifying enriched marker gene sets between conditions. ### DESeq1 High-throughput sequencing assays such as RNA-Seq, ChIP-Seq or barcode counting provide quantitative readouts in the form of count data. To infer differential signal in such data correctly and with good statistical power, estimation of data variability throughout the dynamic range and a suitable error model are required. Simon Anders and Wolfgang Huber propose a method based on the negative binomial distribution, with variance and mean linked by local regression and present an implementation, [DESeq](http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/3.8/bioc/html/DESeq.html), as an R/Bioconductor package. ### DESeq2 In comparative high-throughput sequencing assays, a fundamental task is the analysis of count data, such as read counts per gene in RNA-seq, for evidence of systematic changes across experimental conditions. Small replicate numbers, discreteness, large dynamic range and the presence of outliers require a suitable statistical approach. [DESeq2](http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html), a method for differential analysis of count data, using shrinkage estimation for dispersions and fold changes to improve stability and interpretability of estimates. This enables a more quantitative analysis focused on the strength rather than the mere presence of differential expression. ### __References__ - Anders S, Huber W (2010). “Differential expression analysis for sequence count data.” Genome Biology, 11, R106. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106, http://genomebiology.com/2010/11/10/R106/. - Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014). “Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.” Genome Biology, 15, 550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 36fd18f11e939d3908b1eca8d2939402f7a99b0f

workflow graph Genomic regions intersection and visualization

Genomic regions intersection and visualization ============================================== 1. Merges intervals within each of the filtered peaks files from ChIP/ATAC experiments 2. Overlaps merged intervals and assigns the nearest genes to them

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/intervene.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: c0ca7b140d776eec223ceb1c620eda17281860c4

workflow graph Tumor-Only Detect Variants workflow

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/tumor_only_detect_variants.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 44ada20f3eeb59005d5bd999d2435102e9bae991

workflow graph RNA-Seq pipeline single-read stranded mitochondrial

Slightly changed original [BioWardrobe's](https://biowardrobe.com) [PubMed ID:26248465](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248465) **RNA-Seq** basic analysis for **strand specific single-read** experiment. An additional steps were added to map data to mitochondrial chromosome only and then merge the output. Experiment files in [FASTQ](http://maq.sourceforge.net/fastq.shtml) format either compressed or not can be used. Current workflow should be used only with single-read strand specific RNA-Seq data. It performs the following steps: 1. `STAR` to align reads from input FASTQ file according to the predefined reference indices; generate unsorted BAM file and alignment statistics file 2. `fastx_quality_stats` to analyze input FASTQ file and generate quality statistics file 3. `samtools sort` to generate coordinate sorted BAM(+BAI) file pair from the unsorted BAM file obtained on the step 1 (after running STAR) 5. Generate BigWig file on the base of sorted BAM file 6. Map input FASTQ file to predefined rRNA reference indices using Bowtie to define the level of rRNA contamination; export resulted statistics to file 7. Calculate isoform expression level for the sorted BAM file and GTF/TAB annotation file using `GEEP` reads-counting utility; export results to file

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/rnaseq-se-dutp-mitochondrial.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: b4d578c2ba4713a5a22163d9f8c7105acda1f22e

workflow graph scRNA-seq pipeline using Salmon and Alevin

https://github.com/hubmapconsortium/visium-pipeline.git

Path: pipeline.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 37af2055e751f8c8ca68757648f24ea290bf5291

workflow graph scatter-wf3.cwl#main

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/scatter-wf3.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: f997d13af87216e9b5048c732a511053c7ba714c

Packed ID: main

workflow graph steplevel-resreq.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/steplevel-resreq.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: f207d168f4e7eb4dd2279840d4062ba75d9c79c3

workflow graph Detect Docm variants

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/subworkflows/docm_cle.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 31602b94b34ff55876147c7299e1bec47e8d1a31

workflow graph Detect Variants workflow

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/detect_variants.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 1437aed13d240fd624f78df2c7efb096c5079d73