Explore Workflows

Creates indices for: * [STAR](https://github.com/alexdobin/STAR) v2.5.3a (03/17/2017) PMID: [23104886](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23104886) * [bowtie](http://bowtie-bio.sourceforge.net/tutorial.shtml) v1.2.0 (12/30/2016) It performs the following steps: 1. `STAR --runMode genomeGenerate` to generate indices, based on [FASTA](http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/FASTA/) and [GTF](http://mblab.wustl.edu/GTF2.html) input files, returns results as an array of files 2. Outputs indices as [Direcotry](http://www.commonwl.org/v1.0/CommandLineTool.html#Directory) data type 3. Separates *chrNameLength.txt* file from Directory output 4. `bowtie-build` to generate indices requires genome [FASTA](http://zhanglab.ccmb.med.umich.edu/FASTA/) file as input, returns results as a group of main and secondary files

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/genome-indices.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 4106b7dc96e968db291b7a61ecd1641aa3b3dd6d

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.1.git

Path: tests/io-union-input-default-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 664835e83eb5e57eee18a04ce7b05fb9d70d77b7

Reverse the lines in a document, then sort those lines.

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/revsort.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 665141f319e6b23bd9924b14844f2e979f141944

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/immuno.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: d2c2f2eb846ae2e9cdcab46e3bb88e42126cb3f5

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/count-lines11-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 7ec307b01442936fad9b1149f4500496557505ff

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.1.git

Path: tests/record-in-secondaryFiles-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 664835e83eb5e57eee18a04ce7b05fb9d70d77b7

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: tests/wf/811.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 55ccde7c2fe3e7899136ce8606a341e292d7050a

Runs DESeq2 using LRT (Likelihood Ratio Test) ============================================= The LRT examines two models for the counts, a full model with a certain number of terms and a reduced model, in which some of the terms of the full model are removed. The test determines if the increased likelihood of the data using the extra terms in the full model is more than expected if those extra terms are truly zero. The LRT is therefore useful for testing multiple terms at once, for example testing 3 or more levels of a factor at once, or all interactions between two variables. The LRT for count data is conceptually similar to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculation in linear regression, except that in the case of the Negative Binomial GLM, we use an analysis of deviance (ANODEV), where the deviance captures the difference in likelihood between a full and a reduced model. When one performs a likelihood ratio test, the p values and the test statistic (the stat column) are values for the test that removes all of the variables which are present in the full design and not in the reduced design. This tests the null hypothesis that all the coefficients from these variables and levels of these factors are equal to zero. The likelihood ratio test p values therefore represent a test of all the variables and all the levels of factors which are among these variables. However, the results table only has space for one column of log fold change, so a single variable and a single comparison is shown (among the potentially multiple log fold changes which were tested in the likelihood ratio test). This indicates that the p value is for the likelihood ratio test of all the variables and all the levels, while the log fold change is a single comparison from among those variables and levels. **Technical notes** 1. At least two biological replicates are required for every compared category 2. Metadata file describes relations between compared experiments, for example ``` ,time,condition DH1,day5,WT DH2,day5,KO DH3,day7,WT DH4,day7,KO DH5,day7,KO ``` where `time, condition, day5, day7, WT, KO` should be a single words (without spaces) and `DH1, DH2, DH3, DH4, DH5` correspond to the experiment aliases set in **RNA-Seq experiments** input. 3. Design and reduced formulas should start with **~** and include categories or, optionally, their interactions from the metadata file header. See details in DESeq2 manual [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#interactions) and [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#likelihood-ratio-test) 4. Contrast should be set based on your metadata file header and available categories in a form of `Factor Numerator Denominator`, where `Factor` - column name from metadata file, `Numerator` - category from metadata file to be used as numerator in fold change calculation, `Denominator` - category from metadata file to be used as denominator in fold change calculation. For example `condition WT KO`.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq-lrt.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: c6bfa0de917efb536dd385624fc7702e6748e61d

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/dynresreq-workflow.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 7ec307b01442936fad9b1149f4500496557505ff

Workflow to merge a large number of maf files into a single consensus bed file

https://github.com/mskcc/pluto-cwl.git

Path: cwl/consensus_bed.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 462f6015c9268a4205b6e81de018a470b8a4a153