Explore Workflows

View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own

Graph Name Retrieved From View
workflow graph kmer_cache_store

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_kmer_cache_store.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 1b8d71c75156a1a62bf0477d59db26010e2dcc29

workflow graph count-lines2-wf.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/count-lines2-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 6003cbb94f16103241b562f2133e7c4acac6c621

workflow graph pass-unconnected.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.2.git

Path: tests/pass-unconnected.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 31ec48a8d81ef7c1b2c5e9c0a19e7623efe4a1e2

workflow graph dynresreq-workflow-inputdefault.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.2.git

Path: tests/dynresreq-workflow-inputdefault.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 31ec48a8d81ef7c1b2c5e9c0a19e7623efe4a1e2

workflow graph DESeq2 (LRT) - differential gene expression analysis using likelihood ratio test

Runs DESeq2 using LRT (Likelihood Ratio Test) ============================================= The LRT examines two models for the counts, a full model with a certain number of terms and a reduced model, in which some of the terms of the full model are removed. The test determines if the increased likelihood of the data using the extra terms in the full model is more than expected if those extra terms are truly zero. The LRT is therefore useful for testing multiple terms at once, for example testing 3 or more levels of a factor at once, or all interactions between two variables. The LRT for count data is conceptually similar to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculation in linear regression, except that in the case of the Negative Binomial GLM, we use an analysis of deviance (ANODEV), where the deviance captures the difference in likelihood between a full and a reduced model. When one performs a likelihood ratio test, the p values and the test statistic (the stat column) are values for the test that removes all of the variables which are present in the full design and not in the reduced design. This tests the null hypothesis that all the coefficients from these variables and levels of these factors are equal to zero. The likelihood ratio test p values therefore represent a test of all the variables and all the levels of factors which are among these variables. However, the results table only has space for one column of log fold change, so a single variable and a single comparison is shown (among the potentially multiple log fold changes which were tested in the likelihood ratio test). This indicates that the p value is for the likelihood ratio test of all the variables and all the levels, while the log fold change is a single comparison from among those variables and levels. **Technical notes** 1. At least two biological replicates are required for every compared category 2. Metadata file describes relations between compared experiments, for example ``` ,time,condition DH1,day5,WT DH2,day5,KO DH3,day7,WT DH4,day7,KO DH5,day7,KO ``` where `time, condition, day5, day7, WT, KO` should be a single words (without spaces) and `DH1, DH2, DH3, DH4, DH5` correspond to the experiment aliases set in **RNA-Seq experiments** input. 3. Design and reduced formulas should start with **~** and include categories or, optionally, their interactions from the metadata file header. See details in DESeq2 manual [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#interactions) and [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#likelihood-ratio-test) 4. Contrast should be set based on your metadata file header and available categories in a form of `Factor Numerator Denominator`, where `Factor` - column name from metadata file, `Numerator` - category from metadata file to be used as numerator in fold change calculation, `Denominator` - category from metadata file to be used as denominator in fold change calculation. For example `condition WT KO`.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq-lrt.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 5561f7ee11dd74848680351411a19aa87b13d27b

workflow graph ST610109.cwl

https://github.com/Marco-Salvi/dtc61.git

Path: ST610109.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 8c2621b1d757d890cbbd0dfe5b363ad014f0a684

workflow graph taxcheck.cwl

Perform taxonomic identification tasks on an input genome

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: taxcheck.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: c009eeba7379efbbd37b8d5013a83f161f06939b

workflow graph exome alignment with qc, no bqsr, no verify_bam_id

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/alignment_exome_mouse.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 22fce2dbdada0c4135b6f0677f78535cf980cb07

workflow graph sum-wf.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/sum-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 4700fbee9a5a3271eef8bc9ee595619d0720431b

workflow graph trimmed_fastq

Quality Control and Raw Data trimming

https://gitlab.bsc.es/lrodrig1/structuralvariants_poc.git

Path: structuralvariants/subworkflows/trimmed_fastq.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 637e294ff72687314faacef2c30cb46874611e50