Explore Workflows

Transform array element coordinates into the coordinate system required by the simulation pipeline (i.e., CORSIKA system).

https://github.com/gammasim/workflows.git

Path: workflows/SetArrayElementCoordinates.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: cc9902d92de18a6b2bf83dfbc50201cf1b7477b4

Pairwise comparison

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_kmer_compare_wnode.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 733ab7198a66a0153d0f03c3022ab53c17325ff8

Cell Ranger ARC Count Gene Expression + ATAC ============================================

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/cellranger-arc-count.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 7030da528559c7106d156284e50ff0ecedab0c4e

This workflow taxonomically classifies paired-end sequencing reads in FASTQ format, that have been optionally adapter trimmed with trimgalore, using Kraken2 and a user-selected pre-built database from a list of [genomic index files](https://benlangmead.github.io/aws-indexes/k2). ### __Inputs__ Kraken2 database for taxonomic classification: - [Viral (0.5 GB)](https://genome-idx.s3.amazonaws.com/kraken/k2_viral_20221209.tar.gz), all refseq viral genomes - [MinusB (8.7 GB)](https://genome-idx.s3.amazonaws.com/kraken/k2_minusb_20221209.tar.gz), standard minus bacteria (archaea, viral, plasmid, human1, UniVec_Core) - [PlusPFP-16 (15.0 GB)](https://genome-idx.s3.amazonaws.com/kraken/k2_pluspfp_16gb_20221209.tar.gz), standard (archaea, bacteria, viral, plasmid, human1, UniVec_Core) + (protozoa, fungi & plant) capped at 16 GB (shrunk via random kmer downselect) - [EuPathDB46 (34.1 GB)](https://genome-idx.s3.amazonaws.com/kraken/k2_eupathdb48_20201113.tar.gz), eukaryotic pathogen genomes with contaminants removed (https://veupathdb.org/veupathdb/app) - [16S_gg_13_5 (73 MB)](https://genome-idx.s3.amazonaws.com/kraken/16S_Greengenes13.5_20200326.tgz), Greengenes 16S rRNA database ([release 13.5](https://greengenes.secondgenome.com/?prefix=downloads/greengenes_database/gg_13_5/), 20200326)\n - [16S_silva_138 (112 MB)](https://genome-idx.s3.amazonaws.com/kraken/16S_Silva138_20200326.tgz), SILVA 16S rRNA database ([release 138.1](https://www.arb-silva.de/documentation/release-1381/), 20200827) Read 1 file: - FASTA/Q input R1 from a paired end library Read 2 file: - FASTA/Q input R2 from a paired end library Advanced Inputs Tab (Optional): - Number of bases to clip from the 3p end - Number of bases to clip from the 5p end ### __Outputs__ - k2db, an upstream database used by kraken2 classifier ### __Data Analysis Steps__ 1. Trimming the adapters with TrimGalore. - This step is particularly important when the reads are long and the fragments are short - resulting in sequencing adapters at the ends of reads. If adapter is not removed the read will not map. TrimGalore can recognize standard adapters, such as Illumina or Nextera/Tn5 adapters. 2. Generate quality control statistics of trimmed, unmapped sequence data 3. (Optional) Clipping of 5' and/or 3' end by the specified number of bases. 4. Mapping reads to primary genome index with Bowtie. ### __References__ - Wood, D.E., Lu, J. & Langmead, B. Improved metagenomic analysis with Kraken 2. Genome Biol 20, 257 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-019-1891-0

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/kraken2-classify-pe.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 69643d8c15f5357a320aa7e2f6adb2e71302fd20

Compare trigger performance between simulations and data.

https://github.com/gammasim/workflows.git

Path: workflows/ValidateTriggerPerformance.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: bf4d4a44a543bcc04f4508ce020751c71550acf5

# Differential gene expression analysis This differential gene expression (DGE) analysis takes as input samples from two experimental conditions that have been processed with an RNA-Seq workflow (see list of \"Upstream workflows\" below). DESeq estimates variance-mean dependence in count data from high-throughput sequencing assays, then tests for DGE based on a model which assumes a negative binomial distribution of gene expression (aligned read count per gene). ### Experimental Setup and Results Interpretation The workflow design uses as its fold change (FC) calculation: condition 1 (c1, e.g. treatment) over condition 2 (c2, e.g. control). In other words: `FC == (c1/c2)` Therefore: - if FC<1 the log2(FC) is <0 (negative), meaning expression in condition1<condition2 (gene is downregulated in c1) - if FC>1 the log2(FC) is >0 (positive), meaning expression in condition1>condition2 (gene is upregulated in c1) In other words, if you have input TREATMENT samples as condition 1, and CONTROL samples as condition 2, a positive L2FC for a gene indicates that expression of the gene in TREATMENT is greater (or upregulated) compared to CONTROL. Next, threshold the p-adjusted values with your FDR (false discovery rate) cutoff to determine if the change may be considered significant or not. It is important to note when DESeq1 or DESeq2 is used in our DGE analysis workflow. If a user inputs only a single sample per condition DESeq1 is used for calculating DGE. In this experimental setup, there are no repeated measurements per gene per condition, therefore biological variability in each condition cannot be captured so the output p-values are assumed to be purely \"technical\". On the other hand, if >1 sample(s) are input per condition DESeq2 is used. In this case, biological variability per gene within each condition is available to be incorporated into the model, and resulting p-values are assumed to be \"biological\". Additionally, DESeq2 fold change is \"shrunk\" to account for sample variability, and as Michael Love (DESeq maintainer) puts it, \"it looks at the largest fold changes that are not due to low counts and uses these to inform a prior distribution. So the large fold changes from genes with lots of statistical information are not shrunk, while the imprecise fold changes are shrunk. This allows you to compare all estimated LFC across experiments, for example, which is not really feasible without the use of a prior\". In either case, the null hypothesis (H0) tested is that there are no significantly differentially expressed genes between conditions, therefore a smaller p-value indicates a lower probability of the H0 occurring by random chance and therefore, below a certain threshold (traditionally <0.05), H0 should be rejected. Additionally, due to the many thousands of independent hypotheses being tested (each gene representing an independent test), the p-values attained by the Wald test are adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg method by default. These \"padj\" values should be used for determination of significance (a reasonable value here would be <0.10, i.e. below a 10% FDR). Further Analysis: Output from the DESeq workflow may be used as input to the GSEA (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis) workflow for identifying enriched marker gene sets between conditions. ### DESeq1 High-throughput sequencing assays such as RNA-Seq, ChIP-Seq or barcode counting provide quantitative readouts in the form of count data. To infer differential signal in such data correctly and with good statistical power, estimation of data variability throughout the dynamic range and a suitable error model are required. Simon Anders and Wolfgang Huber propose a method based on the negative binomial distribution, with variance and mean linked by local regression and present an implementation, [DESeq](http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/3.8/bioc/html/DESeq.html), as an R/Bioconductor package. ### DESeq2 In comparative high-throughput sequencing assays, a fundamental task is the analysis of count data, such as read counts per gene in RNA-seq, for evidence of systematic changes across experimental conditions. Small replicate numbers, discreteness, large dynamic range and the presence of outliers require a suitable statistical approach. [DESeq2](http://www.bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/html/DESeq2.html), a method for differential analysis of count data, using shrinkage estimation for dispersions and fold changes to improve stability and interpretability of estimates. This enables a more quantitative analysis focused on the strength rather than the mere presence of differential expression. ### __References__ - Anders S, Huber W (2010). “Differential expression analysis for sequence count data.” Genome Biology, 11, R106. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106, http://genomebiology.com/2010/11/10/R106/. - Love MI, Huber W, Anders S (2014). “Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2.” Genome Biology, 15, 550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8.

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 12e5256de1b680c551c87fd5db6f3bc65428af67

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: subworkflows/chipseq-gen-bigwig.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 9a2c389364674221fab3f0f6afdda799e6aa3247

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_hmmsearch_wnode.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: a2d6cd4c53bf3501f6bd79edebb7ca30bba8456f

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/count-lines4-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: c6cced7a2e6389d2eb43342e702677ccb7c7497c

Slightly changed original [BioWardrobe's](https://biowardrobe.com) [PubMed ID:26248465](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248465) **RNA-Seq** basic analysis for **strand specific pair-end** experiment. An additional steps were added to map data to mitochondrial chromosome only and then merge the output. Experiment files in [FASTQ](http://maq.sourceforge.net/fastq.shtml) format either compressed or not can be used. Current workflow should be used only with the pair-end strand specific RNA-Seq data. It performs the following steps: 1. `STAR` to align reads from input FASTQ file according to the predefined reference indices; generate unsorted BAM file and alignment statistics file 2. `fastx_quality_stats` to analyze input FASTQ file and generate quality statistics file 3. `samtools sort` to generate coordinate sorted BAM(+BAI) file pair from the unsorted BAM file obtained on the step 1 (after running STAR) 5. Generate BigWig file on the base of sorted BAM file 6. Map input FASTQ file to predefined rRNA reference indices using Bowtie to define the level of rRNA contamination; export resulted statistics to file 7. Calculate isoform expression level for the sorted BAM file and GTF/TAB annotation file using `GEEP` reads-counting utility; export results to file

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/rnaseq-pe-dutp-mitochondrial.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 3fc68366adb179927af5528c27b153abaf94494d