Explore Workflows

View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own

Graph Name Retrieved From View
workflow graph FastQC - a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data

FastQC - a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data ===================================== FastQC aims to provide a simple way to do some quality control checks on raw sequence data coming from high throughput sequencing pipelines. It provides a modular set of analyses which you can use to give a quick impression of whether your data has any problems of which you should be aware before doing any further analysis. The main functions of FastQC are: - Import of data from FastQ files (any variant) - Providing a quick overview to tell you in which areas there may be problems - Summary graphs and tables to quickly assess your data - Export of results to an HTML based permanent report - Offline operation to allow automated generation of reports without running the interactive application

 https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/fastqc.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: b5e16e359007150647b14dc6e038f4eb8dccda79
workflow graph scatter-wf3.cwl#main

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/scatter-wf3.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: bbe20f54deea92d9c9cd38cb1f23c4423133d3de

Packed ID: main
workflow graph Single-Cell Preprocessing Cell Ranger Pipeline

Devel version of Single-Cell Preprocessing Cell Ranger Pipeline ===============================================================

 https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/single-cell-preprocess-cellranger.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 5561f7ee11dd74848680351411a19aa87b13d27b
workflow graph DESeq2 (LRT) - differential gene expression analysis using likelihood ratio test

Runs DESeq2 using LRT (Likelihood Ratio Test) ============================================= The LRT examines two models for the counts, a full model with a certain number of terms and a reduced model, in which some of the terms of the full model are removed. The test determines if the increased likelihood of the data using the extra terms in the full model is more than expected if those extra terms are truly zero. The LRT is therefore useful for testing multiple terms at once, for example testing 3 or more levels of a factor at once, or all interactions between two variables. The LRT for count data is conceptually similar to an analysis of variance (ANOVA) calculation in linear regression, except that in the case of the Negative Binomial GLM, we use an analysis of deviance (ANODEV), where the deviance captures the difference in likelihood between a full and a reduced model. When one performs a likelihood ratio test, the p values and the test statistic (the stat column) are values for the test that removes all of the variables which are present in the full design and not in the reduced design. This tests the null hypothesis that all the coefficients from these variables and levels of these factors are equal to zero. The likelihood ratio test p values therefore represent a test of all the variables and all the levels of factors which are among these variables. However, the results table only has space for one column of log fold change, so a single variable and a single comparison is shown (among the potentially multiple log fold changes which were tested in the likelihood ratio test). This indicates that the p value is for the likelihood ratio test of all the variables and all the levels, while the log fold change is a single comparison from among those variables and levels. **Technical notes** 1. At least two biological replicates are required for every compared category 2. Metadata file describes relations between compared experiments, for example ``` ,time,condition DH1,day5,WT DH2,day5,KO DH3,day7,WT DH4,day7,KO DH5,day7,KO ``` where `time, condition, day5, day7, WT, KO` should be a single words (without spaces) and `DH1, DH2, DH3, DH4, DH5` correspond to the experiment aliases set in **RNA-Seq experiments** input. 3. Design and reduced formulas should start with **~** and include categories or, optionally, their interactions from the metadata file header. See details in DESeq2 manual [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#interactions) and [here](https://bioconductor.org/packages/release/bioc/vignettes/DESeq2/inst/doc/DESeq2.html#likelihood-ratio-test) 4. Contrast should be set based on your metadata file header and available categories in a form of `Factor Numerator Denominator`, where `Factor` - column name from metadata file, `Numerator` - category from metadata file to be used as numerator in fold change calculation, `Denominator` - category from metadata file to be used as denominator in fold change calculation. For example `condition WT KO`.

 https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/deseq-lrt.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 00ea05e22788029370898fd4c17798b11edf0e57
workflow graph tt_univec_wnode.cwl

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_univec_wnode.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: c17cac4c046f8ba2b8574a121c44a72d2e6b27e6
workflow graph kmer_cache_retrieve

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_kmer_cache_retrieve.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 252e7214ac64cb1128881e76743013e61bc7ec38
workflow graph Motif Finding with HOMER with target and background regions from peaks

Motif Finding with HOMER with target and background regions from peaks --------------------------------------------------- HOMER contains a novel motif discovery algorithm that was designed for regulatory element analysis in genomics applications (DNA only, no protein). It is a differential motif discovery algorithm, which means that it takes two sets of sequences and tries to identify the regulatory elements that are specifically enriched in on set relative to the other. It uses ZOOPS scoring (zero or one occurrence per sequence) coupled with the hypergeometric enrichment calculations (or binomial) to determine motif enrichment. HOMER also tries its best to account for sequenced bias in the dataset. It was designed with ChIP-Seq and promoter analysis in mind, but can be applied to pretty much any nucleic acids motif finding problem. For more information please refer to: ------------------------------------- [Official documentation](http://homer.ucsd.edu/homer/motif/)

 https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/homer-motif-analysis-peak.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 64f7fe4438898218fd83133efa25251078f5b27e
workflow graph Trim Galore RNA-Seq pipeline single-read strand specific

Note: should be updated The original [BioWardrobe's](https://biowardrobe.com) [PubMed ID:26248465](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248465) **RNA-Seq** basic analysis for a **single-end** experiment. A corresponded input [FASTQ](http://maq.sourceforge.net/fastq.shtml) file has to be provided. Current workflow should be used only with the single-end RNA-Seq data. It performs the following steps: 1. Trim adapters from input FASTQ file 2. Use STAR to align reads from input FASTQ file according to the predefined reference indices; generate unsorted BAM file and alignment statistics file 3. Use fastx_quality_stats to analyze input FASTQ file and generate quality statistics file 4. Use samtools sort to generate coordinate sorted BAM(+BAI) file pair from the unsorted BAM file obtained on the step 1 (after running STAR) 5. Generate BigWig file on the base of sorted BAM file 6. Map input FASTQ file to predefined rRNA reference indices using Bowtie to define the level of rRNA contamination; export resulted statistics to file 7. Calculate isoform expression level for the sorted BAM file and GTF/TAB annotation file using GEEP reads-counting utility; export results to file

 https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/trim-rnaseq-se-dutp.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 00ea05e22788029370898fd4c17798b11edf0e57
workflow graph RNA-Seq pipeline paired-end

The original [BioWardrobe's](https://biowardrobe.com) [PubMed ID:26248465](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26248465) **RNA-Seq** basic analysis for a **paired-end** experiment. A corresponded input [FASTQ](http://maq.sourceforge.net/fastq.shtml) file has to be provided. Current workflow should be used only with the paired-end RNA-Seq data. It performs the following steps: 1. Use STAR to align reads from input FASTQ files according to the predefined reference indices; generate unsorted BAM file and alignment statistics file 2. Use fastx_quality_stats to analyze input FASTQ files and generate quality statistics files 3. Use samtools sort to generate coordinate sorted BAM(+BAI) file pair from the unsorted BAM file obtained on the step 1 (after running STAR) 4. Generate BigWig file on the base of sorted BAM file 5. Map input FASTQ files to predefined rRNA reference indices using Bowtie to define the level of rRNA contamination; export resulted statistics to file 6. Calculate isoform expression level for the sorted BAM file and GTF/TAB annotation file using GEEP reads-counting utility; export results to file

 https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/rnaseq-pe.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: b5e16e359007150647b14dc6e038f4eb8dccda79
workflow graph gcaccess_from_list

https://github.com/ncbi/pgap.git

Path: task_types/tt_gcaccess_from_list.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: cabb1a9a95244e93294727be8cf5816c38992cb0