CWL Workflow: ValidateTelescopeEfficiency

Workflow: ValidateTelescopeEfficiency

Fetched 2026-08-04 11:21:14 GMT

Verified with cwltool version 3.1.20230201224320

Validate telescope throughput taking into account the optical (mirror configurations, reflectivity, shadowing elements, camera filter, light cones) and camera (photo-detection efficiency) components.

Selected
|
Default Values
Nested Workflows
Tools
Inputs/Outputs

This workflow is Open Source and may be reused according to the terms of: BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License

Note that the tools invoked by the workflow may have separate licenses.

Inputs

ID	Type	Title	Doc
input	String		Placeholder for input data

Steps

ID	Runs	Label	Doc
validate_charge_distribution	tools/validate_charge_distribution.cwl (CommandLineTool)	validate_charge_distribution	Compare (plot, statistical metric) integrated charge spectrum for pedestal events, cosmic-ray measurements and events from artificial light sources between observations (from cosmic-ray and night-sky background events and data from artificial light source) with corresponding simulations. Includes the integrated charge vs pulse maximum and pulse width correlation. Charge distributions from pedestal events allow to validate afterpulsing rates for PMT-type detectors.
validate_telescope_efficiency_by_history	tools/validate_telescope_efficiency_by_history.cwl (CommandLineTool)	validate_telescope_efficiency_by_history	Determine effective mirror area and telescope efficiency. Compare with historical results or with results obtained by reference simulation models. Take into account the photon spectrum of shower events, muonic events, and different levels of night-sky background.
validate_telescope_efficiency_using_muons	tools/validate_telescope_efficiency_using_muons.cwl (CommandLineTool)	validate_telescope_efficiency_using_muons	Compare reconstructed brightness (total intensity) of simulated and measured muons.

Outputs

ID	Type	Label	Doc
output	String		Placeholder for output data