Explore Workflows

View already parsed workflows here or click here to add your own

Graph Name Retrieved From View
workflow graph Bismark Methylation - pipeline for BS-Seq data analysis

Sequence reads are first cleaned from adapters and transformed into fully bisulfite-converted forward (C->T) and reverse read (G->A conversion of the forward strand) versions, before they are aligned to similarly converted versions of the genome (also C->T and G->A converted). Sequence reads that produce a unique best alignment from the four alignment processes against the bisulfite genomes (which are running in parallel) are then compared to the normal genomic sequence and the methylation state of all cytosine positions in the read is inferred. A read is considered to align uniquely if an alignment has a unique best alignment score (as reported by the AS:i field). If a read produces several alignments with the same number of mismatches or with the same alignment score (AS:i field), a read (or a read-pair) is discarded altogether. On the next step we extract the methylation call for every single C analysed. The position of every single C will be written out to a new output file, depending on its context (CpG, CHG or CHH), whereby methylated Cs will be labelled as forward reads (+), non-methylated Cs as reverse reads (-). The output of the methylation extractor is then transformed into a bedGraph and coverage file. The bedGraph counts output is then used to generate a genome-wide cytosine report which reports the number on every single CpG (optionally every single cytosine) in the genome, irrespective of whether it was covered by any reads or not. As this type of report is informative for cytosines on both strands the output may be fairly large (~46mn CpG positions or >1.2bn total cytosine positions in the human genome).

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/bismark-methylation-se.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: ce058d892d330125cd03d0a0d5fb3b321cda0be3

workflow graph count-lines12-wf.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwltool.git

Path: cwltool/schemas/v1.0/v1.0/count-lines12-wf.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 4635090ef98247b1902b3c7a25c007d9db1cb883

workflow graph scatter-valuefrom-wf4.cwl#main

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.2.git

Path: tests/scatter-valuefrom-wf4.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: c7c97715b400ff2194aa29fc211d3401cea3a9bf

Packed ID: main

workflow graph facets.cwl

https://github.com/mskcc/roslin-variant.git

Path: setup/cwl/modules/facets.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 8766def7f70f329e2a4c56239f141685a873599b

workflow graph MAnorm SE - quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq single-read data

What is MAnorm? -------------- MAnorm is a robust model for quantitative comparison of ChIP-Seq data sets of TFs (transcription factors) or epigenetic modifications and you can use it for: * Normalization of two ChIP-seq samples * Quantitative comparison (differential analysis) of two ChIP-seq samples * Evaluating the overlap enrichment of the protein binding sites(peaks) * Elucidating underlying mechanisms of cell-type specific gene regulation How MAnorm works? ---------------- MAnorm uses common peaks of two samples as a reference to build the rescaling model for normalization, which is based on the empirical assumption that if a chromatin-associated protein has a substantial number of peaks shared in two conditions, the binding at these common regions will tend to be determined by similar mechanisms, and thus should exhibit similar global binding intensities across samples. The observed differences on common peaks are presumed to reflect the scaling relationship of ChIP-Seq signals between two samples, which can be applied to all peaks. What do the inputs mean? ---------------- ### General **Experiment short name/Alias** * short name for you experiment to identify among the others **ChIP-Seq SE sample 1** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq single-read experiment to be used as Sample 1 **ChIP-Seq SE sample 2** * previously analyzed ChIP-Seq single-read experiment to be used as Sample 2 **Genome** * Reference genome to be used for gene assigning ### Advanced **Reads shift size for sample 1** * This value is used to shift reads towards 3' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **Reads shift size for sample 2** * This value is used to shift reads towards 5' direction to determine the precise binding site. Set as half of the fragment length. Default 100 **M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff** * Absolute M-value (log2-ratio) cutoff to define biased (differential binding) peaks. Default: 1.0 **P-value cutoff** * P-value cutoff to define biased peaks. Default: 0.01 **Window size** * Window size to count reads and calculate read densities. 2000 is recommended for sharp histone marks like H3K4me3 and H3K27ac, and 1000 for TFs or DNase-seq. Default: 2000

https://github.com/datirium/workflows.git

Path: workflows/manorm-se.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 7ced5a5259dbd8b3fc64456beaeffd44f4a24081

workflow graph Run pindel on provided region

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/subworkflows/pindel_region.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 9c0b1497c467393e1a54735575043dced73e95c4

workflow graph step_valuefrom5_wf_with_id_v1_1.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-utils.git

Path: testdata/step_valuefrom5_wf_with_id_v1_1.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: e78db9870cb744fe36674f43b3223c688e9989e1

workflow graph count-lines11-extra-step-wf-noET.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-v1.2.git

Path: tests/count-lines11-extra-step-wf-noET.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: ea9f8634e41824ac3f81c3dde698d5f0eef54f1b

workflow graph cond-single-source-wf-005.1.cwl

https://github.com/common-workflow-language/cwl-utils.git

Path: testdata/cond-single-source-wf-005.1.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 0ad6983898f0d9001fe0f416f97c4d8b940e384a

workflow graph Bisulfite alignment and QC

https://github.com/genome/analysis-workflows.git

Path: definitions/pipelines/bisulfite.cwl

Branch/Commit ID: 3ee63d8757c341ca98b3b46ec4782862ad19b710